Ulaqat: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton | Ulaqat Map | Cards that actually have a flavor reference |
History: [-] Add your comments: |
Ulaqat: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton | Ulaqat Map | Cards that actually have a flavor reference |
History: [-] Add your comments: |
Torpor doesn't stack, so granting torpor on a common to a card that potentially has torpor itself is an issue.
Is a p/t boost the correct bonus to pair with a keyword that creates p/t boosting counters?
Reminder text here definitely should not say "this creature", but "that creature" or "enchanted creature".
Would granting torpor twice be any more of an issue than another non-stacking ability appearing multiple times? That makes sense about boosting the p/t though.My bad on the reminder text, as I just used the reminder text which was intended for creatures.
Removed p/t boost, reduced cost by 1, specialized reminder text for aura
Torpor is more problematic than a redundant evasion ability, because it is a lot less easily grokked that P/T boost abilities can be redundant.
How often is a p/t boost a replacement effect?
This adds a lot of board complexity which means it would get red-flagged. Especially in multiples, I could see this creating really hard to parse combat scenarios.
Do you think limiting the sac option for the boost to sorcery speed would decrease the potential for board complexity?