Repeatble destruction at common isn't usually done. I see no real problem with this as an uncommon; though I might suggets reducing the toughness a bit to make it more killable.

Even at uncommon, this is over-overpowered. If it was put in an artifact themed block, it would pretty much say "T: Destroy target non-land permanent".

Compare to Molder Slug. I know Gatherer ratings are getting less and less meaningful, but abilities like this are becoming more expensive. And Molder Slug still features a top tier 4.263 rating.

Granted Molder Slug is a 4/6. But with the way that Wizards costs their creatures, I'd suspect a 2/2 version of the same creature would cost 2GGG. The power and toughness is heightened as a bonus tacked on for paying what Wizards probably thinks is a minimal cost for this effect.

yeah i thought there would be a problem, I know playable removable is ALWAYS UNCOMMON (which by the way, is kind of dumb imho)

But I will edit it to stay common, and be underpowered. If you havent noticed my sets are very unbalanced rarities, I could use help with that.

By the way, I plan on remodelling all these sets, but I could use some help

> "I know playable removable is ALWAYS UNCOMMON"

Where have you picked this idea from? It really depends on what kind of gameplay you want to gear your environment towards.

The problem with this card is it's repeatable. It might be okay at uncommon depending. Some perhaps similar: Stingmoggie, Nullmage Shepherd, and Yuki-Onna.

Similar cards that are closer to 'absolutely disgusting' on power scale: Devout Witness, Viashino Heretic, and Shattering Pulse.

I would add discard as a cost or something.

sure thing