| Camadoon: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
|
CardName: Pacification Magician Cost: 1uu Type: Creature - Human Wizard Pow/Tgh: 1/3 Rules Text: Flying {2}{u}, {t}: Tap another target creature. It does not untap during it's controller's next untap step. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Camadoon Uncommon |
History: [-] |
: Tap another target creature. It does not untap during it's controller's next untap step.
Looks quite annoying to deal with. Also, "Magician"? Why not Wizard?
Good question.
Never mind, i thought magician was a creature type....
lol
"Mystic" is actually an existing creature type in MTG if you want to go with something more "exotic".
yussssss
What does the flavor text mean with "those" and "this"? Is it supposed to be something the creature itself says?
Why is a common Human a 3/6?
This is not quite Scaled Behemoth but as a creature with toughness 6 it is not a blocker easily dealt with and hexproof just means its straight out immune to spot-removal.
As is the card seems like it would be better at five mana and/or uncommon.
agreed
actually did something else
This outclasses Primal Huntbeast and green is the creature color while blue is supposed to be weak in creatures.
This outclasses Primal Huntbeast and green is the creature color (especially when it comes to larger sizes) while blue is supposed to be weak in creatures.
To clarify; Blue does get creatures of 4/4 size; but only at higher rarities.
And it probably needs to cost 5.
And finally - flavour. A single human wizard is usually 1/1 or even 0/1. You need something to explain why this guy can fight two grizzly bears at once, and come out in a draw. Heck, he can body-check a war mammoth and walk away with the mammoth dead behind him. That needs some kind of flavour explanation!
Looks like an undercosted Benthic Giant at the moment.
Flavor with a 4/4 human is definitely an issue as well.
What is this design trying to accomplish? You could make it a 1/1 with double prowess.
okay will tinker it and make smaller
I just want to point out that Invisible Stalker was a widely behated card because it was hard to solve. Once it got a permanent p/t boost in form of an Aura, Equipment etc. it could not be opposed in combat or with targeted removal.
Part of the problem was being cheap, but I don't think adding prowess for one mana makes this much better. Also clearly this is now uncommon material rather than common.
yeah an uncommon for sure. Maybe I will tke out Hexproof or unblockable, which do you think?
One or the other. I think you need to let us know what you're aiming for with the card. To fill a mechanical niche in the set? A flavour thing?
im filling the niche of having no blue in this set, honestly not very flavorful, i just realised I don't understand the flavor text, it is probably going to get a bit of a rewrite! Stay tuned!
God this is off color pie - flavor wise. Also I kept with the unblockable and Prowess because I want you to be able to cantrip spam, and then attack for a 3/3 or 4/4 unblockable UEOT