Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Mechanics | Skeleton | Archetypes | Flavor | 1st Playtest | 2nd Playtest | 3rd Playtest

CardName: Shed Innocence Cost: B Type: Enchantment - Aura Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Enchant creature Enchanted creature has hidden and can't be blocked. (As long as it's untapped, your opponents can’t target it.) Flavour Text: Thus unclad Melkor passed from place to place as a shadowy cloud in the hills. Set/Rarity: Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels Uncommon

Shed Innocence
{b}
 
 U 
Enchantment – Aura
Enchant creature
Enchanted creature has hidden and can't be blocked. (As long as it's untapped, your opponents can’t target it.)
Thus unclad Melkor passed from place to place as a shadowy cloud in the hills.
Illus. Anastasiya Sytnik
Updated on 30 Nov 2017 by Tahazzar

Code: UB10

Active?: true

History: [-]

2017-04-01 12:43:00: Tahazzar created the card Shed Innocence

Stealth + "can't block" makes this design rather schizophrenic :S

2017-04-01 15:34:49: Tahazzar edited Shed Innocence:

"it is" -> "it's"

2017-04-07 20:30:36: Tahazzar edited Shed Innocence:

Removed "can't block".

2017-06-16 18:49:37: Tahazzar edited Shed Innocence:

Stealth -> Hidden

Not sure I like the Hidden + Can't be blocked combo either, but you can probably get away with this at 1 mana. Auras are traditionally weak so the best comparisons I can find for this are Aqueous Form in Blue (which gives unblockable + upside, though scry 1 is arguably better than hexproof until attacking), and Predator's Gambit, since Intimdate was sideboard unblockable anyway. Since this gives no P/T bonus, I am not sure I would be happy to have this in a color with so much menace and flying spirit tokens anyway.

2017-08-09 07:19:43: Tahazzar edited Shed Innocence:

­{1}{b} -> {b} as suggested

Fair enough: I applied the mana cost change.

On a side note, what do you think of Final Flowering? Especially if I went with {1}{b} variation that could destroy any land? That would be much more usable in limited. The set is planned to have an uncommon dual land cycle (for ally colors?), but I still don't think that the Flowering would be that pickable in limited as a "nonbasic" version. It's unfortunate that one of the potential prime targets, Undying Lands, has indestructible. Though you could use Final Flowering on your own Undying Lands to get a "gold" token for {b} which isn't half bad. Or maybe Flowering could exile the land instead now that I think about it...

on 30 Nov 2017 by SoulofZendikar:

I like this card. It forces them to have instant-speed removal. I'm not sure about the balance, but I like the effect. B seems like a good place to playtest it.

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
How much damage does this card deal? Lightning Blast
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)