|
CardName: Council of Judgement Cost: 2WW Type: Enchantment Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: At the beginning of each opponent’s upkeep, if that player controls more permanents than you, that player sacrifices the permanent they controls with the highest converted mana cost. If two or more permanents are tied for highest cost, that player chooses one. Flavour Text: Again the Valar were gathered in council at the Ring of Doom, and they were divided in debate. Set/Rarity: Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels Rare
Council of Judgement
  At the beginning of each opponent’s upkeep, if that player controls more permanents than you, that player sacrifices the permanent they controls with the highest converted mana cost. If two or more permanents are tied for highest cost, that player chooses one.
Again the Valar were gathered in council at the Ring of Doom, and they were divided in debate.
Illus. Jacek Kopalski
|
Code: Active?: false History: [-] Add your comments: |
At the cost of 2WW, forcing your opponent to lose their greatest creatures is far too strong and oppressive.
Also it needs to count only nonland permanents. Disincentivizing the playing of lands is never fun. And that's coming from someone that loves Standard Land Destruction decks.
If I were the owner, I would just play this on my top end, and get the biggest 3-4 CMC creatures I could, and play 0 other enchantments, tokens, or lands, and load up on instants and sorceries. Then no one is likely to be able to stop me.
deactivated
code removed