My Universe, My Rules: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Code: History: [-] Add your comments: |
My Universe, My Rules: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Code: History: [-] Add your comments: |
Designed solely to crash MTGO.
Well, that and to be generally hilarious.
:)
Come to think of it, you could also make "0. 0/0. ~ isn't put into the graveyard for having zero toughness", I'm sure it would be good for something :)
Jack: That's actually a card/mechanic I designed a while back. It's quite interesting. It's the opposite of indestructible: any damage kills it, but it's immune to -X/-X effects.
Ah, cool. (Was it in one of your sets?)
I debated the interaction with damage. Obviously any positive damage would kill it, but I debated whether 0 damage would :)
No, I designed it before I was making any sets. I don't think Clockwork Wings is the right place for it. As for 0 damage, heh. Fortunately the CompRules say 0 damage is the same as no damage at all, otherwise it would get confusing. It may be in fact that the ability needs to say "~ isn't put into a graveyard for having 0 or less toughness or for having 0 damage marked on it", which is far less elegant...
Ah, cool. Yes, I don't think it's especially a Seinara or Wings thing. I think you can easily tweak the comp rules to say that in this case, no damage doesn't count, even if that's not how it's interpreted so far. What I wondered was if you could make it live, but die when you fireball it for 0, but I don't think you could make that work :) (You might be able to, if you distinguish between "no damage" and "0 damage" just for this)