My Universe, My Rules: Recent Activity
| My Universe, My Rules: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to My Universe, My Rules: (Generated at 2016-09-26 03:36:39)
Page 1 - Older activity
Page 1 - Older activity
Clive: [13:01] s/skins/sounds/ Clive: [13:01] Competitive Goldfish skins like a Magic card in its own right. Or a modified Munchkin monster.
Image
This could be pure red, with the addition of "Then, you take two damage."
Or even purer red with "Random player re-rolls their life total"
Um, make it a sorcery.
Not sure if I mean it to retrigger all the way down; this is much more fun with a hydra though :)
Ink-Treader Nephilim, yes.
Is this intended to trigger off itself? So if you cast Braingeyser with X=4, you also get X=3, but then also X=2 and X=1?
(I wondered if it needs to explicitly bottom out at 0, too. But I think probably reminder text "(You can't cast spells with X less than 0.)" would do.)
The real fun comes when you've got two of these. Then one Blaze for 4 makes two for 3, and four for 2, and eight for 1. 22 damage for 5 mana - not bad.
Based on hearing half a toothychat conversation about some Ink thing I don't know about.
Sadly they can't put the tokens into 'can'.
Nor did I wish to keyword 'cant', although it would be a good keyword for rogue types.
hit enter too soon
See Ken of Tow.
aww oken rarity hides casting cost. (Of two and two G)
Clive: [14:28] ChrisHowlett: "inscrutability", surely.
Edwin: [14:31] "hard to scrute"
Clive: [14:45] Edwin: "hard to scry"
Qqzm: [14:51] So an empty library is inscrutable?
Clive: [14:46] I believe "scrutable" does just mean "possible to scry", yes?
WeirDoe: [14:56] Qqzm: Normally that isn't a problem since you have already lost when you emptied your library.
Qqzm: [14:55] You don't lose until you attempt to draw from it
WeirDoe: [14:57] So if it is inscutable does that mean you don't lose by scrying since instead of drawing and losing you just don't?
AlexChurchill: [14:57] Scry would never kill you, only "draw"
AlexChurchill: [14:57] But I do like the plan of renaming "death by milling" as "death by inscrutability"
Hee! It's pretty useful to put them onto the battlefield anyway, even if they fail at attacking.
Finger memory typed this alternative to Soul of the Land and I wanted to preserve it somewhere. I don't think it breaks anything; and with flash and land animation in play, would actually be niche useful ;)
give it a name
Reminiscent of Sundial of the Infinite, in regards to some of the things this can do.
Come to think of it maybe "skip your end step" would be a more workable version of Staying Power. (It doesn't make giant growth permanent, but it does for the things alex listed)
Player 1: A attacks! B attacks! Player 2: C attacks! D attacks! Player 1: A blocks C! Player 2: C blocks B! Player 1: Uh... now A isn't doing anything useful.. oh wait; it's attacking again!
"their blockers if any return to attacking"?
Was: "Marshmallow Griffin has whichever abilities are most common among the revealed creatures."
Wow, wordy now.
fixie?
I was thinking Dark Heart of the Wood for some reason.
let's try it
was: Intention: Combat the way I got it wrong in my first ever game. Every player chooses which creatures are involved in combat, and then each creature involved can be a blocker instead. So something like, all defender's creatures that did not block may now attack (and attacker may block)
:)