Exodus: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton | Ma'at has fallen, The World is ending |
CardName: Herald to Lorwyn Cost: {U2}{G2}{B2} Type: Creature - Elemental Druid Pow/Tgh: 3/3 Rules Text: {3}: Each player puts the top three cards of their libraries into their graveyards. {4}, {t}: Return a land card from a graveyard onto the battlefield under your control if {G} was spent to activate this ability. Return a creature card from a graveyard onto the battlefield under your control if {B} was spent to activate this ability. Draw a card if {U} was spent to activate this ability. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Exodus Mythic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 3/3
|
Code: MZ05 History: [-] Add your comments: |
Lorwyn/Shadowmoor
3B - reanimate (awesome)
3G - ramp
3U - draw a card (lolol)
2UB - reanimate plus draw a card (awesome)
2GB - solemn simulacrum aint bad
2UG - land + draw a card, eh
UGB - omg a solemn simulacrum right there!
talk about flexibility!
That is indeed awesome. I note that your costs are a bit high since you've given the activated ability a twobrid cost: you can cantrip-reanimate for

, or get all three effects for just 

. I'm not sure there's much point to the twobrid cost if you're caring about what was spent on it; just charge a flat
and then ask what mana was spent to pay that.
Sadly this is much too wordy to keep the flavour text from the cycle. Most mythics don't have flavour text; trying to get a cycle of flavour texts onto a cycle of mythics might be problematic. You might want to split this into two cycles, like the Treva, the Renewer cycle and the Treva's Attendant cycle: the dragons were too wordy for flavour text so the Invasion design team created another cycle aligned with the dragons, principally to bear the flavour text about them.
I agree.
I'll make another cycle and keep the flavor text there =D
the thing with 2/C is that if I use only hybrid I can't make it as flexible. 3 colours don't work well with 2 colour hybrid mana.
I wasn't suggesting an activation cost of

, I was suggesting
. Since you can still care about the mana spent to activate it anyway.
oh, really? hmmm that sounds pretty cool.
I'll change it.