Unfortunately, I think this is useless as worded, since it only functions on the battlefield. I believe it needs to read "As long as you control a Vedalken, you may cast ~ as though it had flash."

Thanks, I was wondering how to correctly word this.

A common 3/3 flying for that if another one is in play "which seems easy since they are common" It has flash aswell? This is to good even for an Uncommon imo. First pick any day.

It sure is strong but I hardly think it's "above uncommon". Nephalia Seakite trades 1 point of power for always having flash and is fine at common. Even if this was too powerful for common, which it might be, it would make a perfectly acceptable uncommon.

Looking at gatherer, common gets 3/3 flying with upside, but usually for 5 mana or 4 mana with two colours. 5 mana would certainly be fine; 4 mana wouldn't be game breaking but would be very unusual. I do think the extra points of P/T matter -- at limited, one 3/3 with evasion can be significantly better than a 3/2 or a 2/3.

It's definitely fine at uncommon; uncommon gets much bigger things.

I definitely agree a 3/3 flier is significantly better than a 2/3 flier, I'm just saying that this card is a lot closer to reasonable than it was claimed to be.

Everything in this set is in constant flux so it's possible this card ends up being uncommon or not in the set at all. I mostly put it where it is so that it wasn't strictly better or worse than Nephalia Seakite or Faerie Invaders, two similar cards. It could probably at least cost .