Envertol: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Mechanics | Skeleton | Envertol Map

CardName: Singeing Glowworms Cost: {5}{B} Type: Creature - Insect Ooze Pow/Tgh: 2/6 Rules Text: Punish (At the beginning of each end step, if this creature is tapped, it deals 1 damage to each opponent that lost life this turn.) Flavour Text: The larvae offer cheap light in Kremsha's mines and double as a punishment for the disobedient. Set/Rarity: Envertol Common

Singeing Glowworms
{5}{b}
 
 C 
Creature – Insect Ooze
Punish (At the beginning of each end step, if this creature is tapped, it deals 1 damage to each opponent that lost life this turn.)
The larvae offer cheap light in Kremsha's mines and double as a punishment for the disobedient.
2/6
Updated on 09 Feb 2019 by Sorrow

History: [-]

2019-01-31 19:54:37: Sorrow created the card Singeing Glowworms
2019-01-31 20:23:59: Sorrow edited Singeing Glowworms

"At the beginning of each end step, if this creature is tapped, it deals 1 damage to each opponent that lost life this turn." Makes it more clear what the trigger conditions are in

I wonder why this only punishes opponents that were dealt damage and not those that have otherwise lost life.

This keyword gets quadratically stronger with the number of players in free-for-all multiplayer games. If you have a reliable repeatable damage effect e. g. Pyrohemia this can deal 12 damage per turn-cycle in a four-player game as opposed to 2 damage in a two-player game.

I chose damage over the general loss of life since this mechanic appears in RB and red deals in damage. I also didn't want the card to work with drain spells (whether or not that's a good decision, I don't know).

2019-02-08 00:22:44: Sorrow edited Singeing Glowworms:

Ooze type instead of slime. Maybe just remove ooze? Slime sounded kind of right, but not ooze. I'm also just biased against oozes.

I don't see the reason a mechanic is supposed to work with burn, but not drain - especially since the reasoning "appears in RB and red deals damage" sounds quite similar to "appears in RB and black drains life".

It's that distinction that I don't get and that might trip up players.

Speaking of creature types. Aren't Worms their own thing? A larva of sn Insect shouldn't be called a worm, but a grub or maggot etc. IIRC.

I think I thought drain effects might be too common when I wanted Punish to push more aggressive creature strategies?

As for the creature type, these are commonly called glow worms in real life, but are not worms themselves. Bioluminescent Fungalgnats. There are beetle larvae also called glow worms, that are also not worms, but I was going for the fungus gnat larvae.

Burn seems much more common than drain, esp considering Wizards' recent trend of giving black direct damage instead. I personally think having this check for life loss instead of damage would be nice, since it opens up options in other formats. You can still build this format to push the aggro archetype

I suspect (though have no real evidence) that wizards are trying to simplify away the distinction.

Oh, update. Just listened to mark's latest podcast (on burn spells) and they've officially decided to go back to giving black life loss and red direct damage. Yay

Where do they talk about going back? I'm all in favor of it and am awaiting their decision anxiously.

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
What is this card's power? Hollowhenge Beast
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)