| My Universe, My Rules: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
|
Code: History: [-] Add your comments: |
| My Universe, My Rules: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
|
Code: History: [-] Add your comments: |
"303.4b The object or player an Aura is attached to is called enchanted."
Hmm. As a way to enable Fencer's Magemark and friends to apply to whatever you want, presumably. Was this meant to be an Artifact as well as an Enchantment? In which case I guess you're aiming for similar space to Soulblade of Honour?
701.3a says "An Aura, Equipment, or Fortification can’t be attached to an object it couldn’t enchant, equip, or fortify, respectively." Technically this is an Aura that doesn't have an enchant ability, so it can't be attached to anything, so it'll fall off immediately and die. Also without "enchant X" it enters unattached and again will die for being an unattached Aura.
yes; make artifact so it stays attached. And, uh, typeline is now too too long.
Purpose is mainly for "That's a silly rule. I can be attached for all SORTS of non-enchanting reasons".
Except the rules tie together very tightly and neatly, and this is still going to die because it doesn't have enchant anything.
If you add "Enchant permanent" then this works.
The parallelism between enchanting and equipping, and the way they both use the same concept of "attach", is indeed intriguing, if that's what you're getting at. It's possible to have an object that's an Enchantment - Aura with enchant creature suddenly start to instead be an Artifact - Equipment and remain attached to the same creature, which is fun. Ditto vice versa, which is what my Soulblade of Honour does, and the DFC version Soulblade of Honor inspired by it.