Hinterlands of Ghocamer
Hinterlands of Ghocamer by amuseum
93 cards in Multiverse
60 commons, 19 uncommons, 12 rares, 2 mythics
15 white, 14 blue, 21 black, 20 red,
10 green, 2 multicolour, 10 split, 1 artifact
16 comments total
Primary races: Kithkin Merfolk Vampire Pyrfolk Dryad
Hinterlands of Ghocamer: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Brainstorm |
The set creator would like to draw your attention to these comments:
On Shocking Bolt (reply): |
Recently active cards: (all recent activity)
Target creature gets -1/-1 until end of turn.
At the beginning of the next upkeep, it gets a +1/+1 counter.
At the beginning of the next upkeep, it gets a +1/+1 counter.
Queen: A mother knowingly giving her son poison to consume.
Crown Prince: You would rather have me grow a tolerance to poison than see me be poisoned.
Crown Prince: You would rather have me grow a tolerance to poison than see me be poisoned.
When Exhaust Scryer enters, create a Gift token (A colorless enchantment artifact with "Sorcerous,
,
, Sacrifice this permanent: Target permanent gets a +1/+1, charge, level, loyalty, or fate counter").
, Exhaust an artifact token (tap an artifact token you control that are untapped): Scry 1.



0/2
Moonlight Walker enters phased out.
2/3
When White Phase Removal enters, target creature or planeswalker phases out until White Phase Removal leaves. You gain life equal to the mana values of that permanent and all Attachment (Aura, Equipment, and/or Fortification)s attached to it.
Flash
When White Phaser enters, target nonland permanent phases out.
When White Phaser enters, target nonland permanent phases out.
2/1
Recent comments: (all recent activity)
See other cardsets
lines from "Bloody Heart" ep. 13
a black mother shows tough love to her children. at first will be painful, but will grow stronger, if they survive the trial.
exhaust
which keyword?
That much repeatable scrying at common could be an issue.
I still can't believe you made a keyword action that is literally just another already existing keyword action.
A common that can tutor a permanent and put it onto the battlefield circumventing any cost seems unlikely.
this creature takes a bit of green and/or black abilities.
I explain why I moved double strike to black: http://www.magicmultiverse.net/cardsets/367/comments#comment_122338
Is double strike a black mechanic or a green mechanic to you?
The only thing different about this card really seems to be the inverted symbol order in the mana cost. Otherwise it's a burn spell to the face + set mechanic. Wording really similar to well-known cards like Blightning.
I don't understand. "To target player" has always been a valid template?
You might be thinking of "exert".
> amuseum wrote: "the template doesn't change the valid targets"
It literally says "target player" for me.
> amuseum wrote: "it only adds an additional effect if a player was damaged this way"
Actually, the effect gets past absorb as it is worded.