Recent updates to Arcunda: (Generated at 2025-05-02 04:19:24)
Another possible reason to keep the either/or version is overall complexity.
...which I had before. What you're seeing is the result of a vacillation over whether this was too good for common, and getting halfway to making it just one or the other, then deciding just to recost.
Ah, but the datapoint I costed it from was Boomerang + Cantrip.
Yes, thanks.
Would it help if it was "activated ability"? The intention is to provide an answer to Chargeup abilities.
Could easily be draw 2 (probably for 2UU), really.
Nice twist on Regress. Wording probably needs slight rearrangement to use the standard modal template with a semicolon.
The cost of 1UU made me raise my eyebrows - just turning -> to add a cantrip to Regress - but it's possibly printable.
Should this be Stasis Cell (with one T)?
Another possible reason to keep the either/or version is overall complexity.
...which I had before. What you're seeing is the result of a vacillation over whether this was too good for common, and getting halfway to making it just one or the other, then deciding just to recost.
Ah, but the datapoint I costed it from was Boomerang + Cantrip.
Yes, thanks.
Would it help if it was "activated ability"? The intention is to provide an answer to Chargeup abilities.
Could easily be draw 2 (probably for 2UU), really.
Nice twist on Regress. Wording probably needs slight rearrangement to use the standard modal template with a semicolon.
The cost of 1UU made me raise my eyebrows - just turning
->
to add a cantrip to Regress - but it's possibly printable.
Should this be Stasis Cell (with one T)?