Mashup: the Gathering Workbench: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

CardName: Anti-Aura Acolyte Cost: 2R Type: Creature - Elemental Shaman Pow/Tgh: 2/2 Rules Text: Protection from enchantments {W}, Discard Anti-Aura Acolyte: Target creature gains protection from enchantments until end of turn. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Mashup: the Gathering Workbench Common

Anti-Aura Acolyte
{2}{r}
 
 C 
Creature – Elemental Shaman
Protection from enchantments
{w}, Discard Anti-Aura Acolyte: Target creature gains protection from enchantments until end of turn.
2/2
Created on 06 Aug 2011 by jmgariepy

History: [-]

2011-08-06 23:26:02: jmgariepy created the card Anti-Aura Acolyte

Random Generator gave me Inner-Flame Acolyte and Anti-Magic Aura. I can't see why red creatures wouldn't have protection from enchantments. I know they shouldn't be destroying enchantents, but they hate white, and don't like to be Pacify-ed. I had to compromise with this card using another color to get its evoke to work, though. It turns out that "Channel" is yet another useless word in Magic that stifles future designers because, since the word exists, the mechanic must be tied to Kamigawa in some way.

The name "Channel" is pretty flavour-neutral, though. I wouldn't say it's "tied to Kamigawa" in any meaningful sense.

No, I wouldn't either. I'm sure they recognized how open-ended that ability was and they gave it an open ended name (though, the evidently couldn't stop but put their thumb in the pie for "Bushido").

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
How much damage does this card deal? Lava Axe
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)