| Wilds of Muraganda: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
|
CardName: Gather the Thatchers Cost: 2/R2/W Type: Sorcery Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Create two 1/1 white Warrior creature tokens. They gain haste until end of turn. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Wilds of Muraganda Uncommon |
Code: UZ01 History: [-] Add your comments: |
I think this might be my favorite goldbrid design, since it has some additional value in RG (harmony) or UW (prowess/instant & sorceries). I suppose it actually synergizes with B reclaim as well, but I don't expect many B decks to be interested in paying 4 for this.
--CF
I like this, but it's technically a color bleed/break/bend, since it's giving monowhite access to haste.
There's been significant discussion about how to handle the "goldbrid" cards piewise, both within the team and with other commentators. Part of what makes it contentious/tricky is that not a lot of twobrid cards exist so far. But Flame Javelin gives monoW burn. Beseech the Queen gives monoW tutoring. All indications so far are that twobrid follows the "colorless can do almost anything, as long as it pays enough for it" philosophy behind swiftfoot boots and Scour from Existence -- twobrid gives you access to an in pie effect for cheap, and an effect from the "colorless pie" when you pay the colorless price for it. As such, goldbrid is closer to gold than to hybrid as far as access to colored effects goes.
It might be a bleed, or a bend, or neither, depending on how you decide to approach things -- but it's not a break. So while the discussion is ongoing I'm personally pretty comfortable with our current handling of these cards.
--CF
Hmm. Yes, I guess it is comparable to Arcbound Hybrid / Iron League Steed. Twobrid does seem to be following the same colour pie rules as artifacts.
... which, if we're being snarky, is looking more and more like none at all (no rules). "If it's colorless, just slam another +
in there and you'll be fine - regardless of the effect."
Sorry, I had to, though I know this discussion has already reached a point where it's running in circles.
Funnily enough, this seems appropriate to me, even though I sometimes side-eye innovations in the color pie guidelines.