Could probably cost a lot less. (Presuming you intend that as a wall it can't attack...?). Animate Land was just .

Well it's not explicitly defender, but i figured it discouraged attacking enough by itself - should i give it defender?

i will adjust the cost accordingly.

Indeed, I think this cost is fine given Living Terrain and Awakener Druid.

It's kinda unusual to have a wall without defender (that hasn't been explicitly animated by some other card) - but the (modern) rules support it just fine.

Don't make it a Wall if you're not giving it defender. You'll just confuse tons of people.

I think this is too marginal. I could play Living Terrain because a 5/6 for five (four plus having the land untapped) is reasonable, especially with "haste". But a 1/4 with reach is not exciting at all. I'd rather it be a creature card and not bother my mana most of the time.