BandaBox 3: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Skeleton | Cycles | Skeleton ver. 2 | Ver. 2 Changes

CardName: Soldier of Fire and Ice Cost: (U/R)(U/R) Type: Creature - Human Soldier Pow/Tgh: 2/2 Rules Text: Protection from blue and from red Whenever Soldier of Fire and Ice deals combat damage to a player, you may pay {U} and draw a card, and/or you may pay {R} and have Soldier of Fire and Ice deal 2 damage to target creature or player. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: BandaBox 3 Mythic

Soldier of Fire and Ice
({u/r})({u/r})
 
 M 
Creature – Human Soldier
Protection from blue and from red
Whenever Soldier of Fire and Ice deals combat damage to a player, you may pay {u} and draw a card, and/or you may pay {r} and have Soldier of Fire and Ice deal 2 damage to target creature or player.
Illus. Jarreau Wimberly & Mark Zug
2/2
Updated on 20 Sep 2013 by Shiny_Umbreon

Code: CH44

Active?: true

History: [-]

2012-05-31 22:46:14: Shiny_Umbreon created the card Soldier of Fire and Ice

Fascinating cycle. Less good than the original swords, while still being excellent. The "If you control a LANDTYPE" rider is unfortunate; couldn't they just be gold cards? It'd make them less playable, although depending on how much manafixing you've got it'd make them more splashable... hmm.

Strange slot, I know. I'm a little conservative with power, but people expect many powerful cards in a Cube (even when it's done by me). The Swords (and Jitte) are pretty much THE equipment. But we all know that they all are plain bombs in any Limited format because they are colorless, cheap, reusable, provide huge advantages and are of a permanent type that's not easy to get rid of.

It's not cool when the format is dominated by these few cheap universal weapons (or when Stoneforge Mystic is that easy to pick instead of being a build-around-me). Jitte is out of the question, and the Swords are kinda too powerful. I like having some cards that are obviously powerful (every draft format should), but not a whole cycle, especially if their power is because of their flexibility. What I think kills them is the double protection. Without them, the cards are okay, if a bit weak, but protection not only makes them incredibly easy to trigger (I know it's the point). It also randomly hoses opponents very badly. So I was thinking that instead it'd be cool to reference them (in a card with okay power). That way I wouldn't have cards I didn't like in my format, but people could still relate to these.

I thought about a creature that was supposedly wielding one of the swords. 1CC 2/2 came to mind immediately. Then I realized that the saboteur ability was often things that couldn't be in only one color. (I'll say why in a second.) Light and Shadow in monoblack kinda made sense but the reference to two colors was strange. Then I settled for "multicolored" white cards. One had protection from black and the life gain from Light and Shadow, and if you controlled a Swamp, protection from white and the Disentomb part. The other was was the same for War and Peace. It was a bit sad that monowhite had better protection creatures and that their effect was only life gain. Also, the conditional protection was taking too much text. I also didn't like that more popular swords (Fire and Ice and Feast and Famine) weren't referenced. So I changed it to a whole cycle and dropped the condition for self-protection.

It's in this direction because the effects were more interesting this way if you didn't have the other basic land type. A variable (promising) life gain is better than 3; damage-triggered damage isn't common; damage-triggered draws are common but mill effects are few; damage-triggered discard happens with Specters already, but untapping all your lands does not. Making wolves was the only cool one, but so is untapping your lands.

While these are cool from a design perspective, they look promising in play. I imagine this is the most powerful one (surprise, it has "Fire and Ice" in its name), and it certainly looks like a red mirror breaker. Soldier of War and Peace also seems to be good against aggresive white decks. Soldier of Body and Mind may be the weakest one, but I'm okay with that. And it can actually mill you before it kills you (especially in a 40-ish card deck format), unlike the sword.

The reason they aren't multicolor is that, from experience, I know you don't want many multicolored slots. You want them to be as juicy as possible so that they pull you (or reward you), not "okay, I'll take it because I'm playing the colors". With that said, these multicolor-friendly are definitely helping, and I'm happy to have a splashy cycle of them, but they don't count as multicolor in that you don't have to commit.

2012-06-03 05:02:57: Shiny_Umbreon edited Soldier of Fire and Ice

Okay, now hybrid. It makes a little more sense, and what I first found boring ("another Thieving Magpie-esque blue creature", "another black Specter") will be kinda useful for the redundancy. I'm afraid I don't have many hybrid slots for these, but I'll see how many I truly need. They can go back to being monocolored if necessary.

2012-07-12 23:20:45: Shiny_Umbreon edited Soldier of Fire and Ice
2013-01-20 01:02:32: Shiny_Umbreon edited Soldier of Fire and Ice
2013-08-10 22:13:01: Shiny_Umbreon edited Soldier of Fire and Ice
2013-09-20 03:17:04: Shiny_Umbreon edited Soldier of Fire and Ice

After a lot of iterations, these guys ended up triggering if you controlled the appropiate type. They were mostly playable but not exciting, so I decided to juice them up a bit and take them down to two mana. They were fine, but they are, oh, so much pain against specific decks. Instead of checking a basic land, I added a one mana payment of the appropiate color.

They are still very interesting cards, and I'm eager to find out which are the best compared to the swords.

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
What is this card's power? Hollowhenge Beast
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)