Traditions of Glasmarn: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton | References/Inspiration | The Gods of Glasmarn and Their Cults |
CardName: Death-Drinker Cob-Weaver Cost: {3}{G} Type: Creature - Spider Pow/Tgh: 2/4 Rules Text: Reach, Esoteric (Whenever you cast a spell with a mana value greater than the number of lore counters on this creature, it gains a lore counter.) {T}, Remove any number of lore counters from Death-Drinker Cob-Weaver: Exile target creature card with mana value X from a graveyard and you gain X life, where X is the number of counters removed this way. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Traditions of Glasmarn Common Reach, Esoteric (Whenever you cast a spell with a mana value greater than the number of lore counters on this creature, it gains a lore counter.)
![]() 2/4
|
History: [-] Add your comments: |
power raised to two
I know the use of X is a red flag for commons.
While a red flag, that does not mean it cannot happen. My reasonings were as follow.
1.The ability itself is slow enough that it should not be of much relevance. Unless this is being played against onedrop.dec, the ability won't go off too often. This will lead into the next point. 2.Low-power. In all liklihoods, this could hit a single, larger target and bounce back a somewhat or frequent small targets for a little life that could be inconsistent. As for the body's stats, they're pretty weak.
For those reasons, I think a more obvious template would be "T, Remove any number of lore counters from ~: Return target creature card with mana value X from your graveyard to your hand and you gain X life, where X is the number of counters removed this way." You're fighting for text space though with that reminder text
I think it's suboptimal to use the same counter type as sagas. They errataed a handful of older cards to stop using lore counters for that reason
Changed to SecretInfiltrator's wording
It looks like Mindunbound, Scrolls of the Masters, and Myth Realized still use Lore counters. While counter space isn't particularly limited, I didn't want to throw out a new counter type that didn't do anything itself while wanting a name more flavorful than "charge." If I do change the counter name type, I'll go with wisdom counter.