---
--- by biancospino
101 cards in Multiverse
74 with no rarity, 12 commons, 8 uncommons,
4 rares, 3 mythics
3 colourless, 16 white, 11 blue, 12 black, 11 red,
16 green, 16 multicolour, 3 hybrid, 6 artifact, 7 land
15 comments total
---: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recently active cards: (all recent activity)
Target tapped creature you control deals damage equal to its power to another target creature. If this spell was cast and no mana was spent to cast it, copy it, and you may choose new targets for the copy.
Harmonize
.
Harmonize

Exhaust —
: Flutterwisp gains flying and becomes the colors of target spell you don't control.
: Add one mana of a color Flutterwisp is.


3/2
Ward — Regenerate Varmint Revenant.
1/1

If you would sacrifice Professional Flagellant, return it to its owner's hand instead.
0/1
Recent comments: (all recent activity)
See other cardsets
(N.B.: if you keep paying the cost, this has 2 age counters after the first upkeep, 6 after the second, then 14, 30, 62 etc, since each time it goes n -> (n+1)*2)
Uh. That's indeed a problem. I think this trick (quite ugly, admittedly) may work? This way, it enters as a 0/1, the soulbond "when this enters" trigger can be allowed to resolve, then this becomes a -7/-7 when it is already (possibly) paired
I think there's a mechanical problem here. Soulbond's nested rulings begin with "When this creature enters, ..." - notably not "As this creature enters, ...", meaning that this would as is this die to state-based actions before it could ever get that +10/+10 from the soulbond ability.
That's fair; added a clause to make the process essentially ignore lands
Rebound is a may. This is specifically designed to force being cast again, as a drawback
You misspelled "rebound" as "oath".
I feel lands skew the viability of the two options too much and there needs to be a further distinction for land/nonland.
What does concern me a bit is that this with "in addition" would effectively allow for up to nine extra cards (thou likely over multiple turns) with some selection. Maybe it's fine but seems a bit much?
I might actually recert back to two cards per kicker cost. May be too much of a nerf, not sure
The cost and hoops are strong enough that you could easily replace "instead" with "in addition".
Correct wording for a replacement effect is "if you would draw a card" rather than "whenever you would draw a card".
This is an attempt at a monowhite no-question-asked removal