Dusk on Tsanaa: Recent Activity
| Dusk on Tsanaa: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton | About the Set (In Progress) |
Recent updates to Dusk on Tsanaa: (Generated at 2025-05-01 10:58:37)
A blue milll/conspire enabler that can help Starved and feels tricky/opened ended. Trying to get flavour of H. P. Lovecrafts Migu.
Every color is capable of being evil and white can have a omnicidal streak. See Barren Glory or the flavour behind most of whites Wrath effects.
White gets Balance and more recently Tragic Arrogance. While mutual sacrifice is primary in black, white is secondary in it. White is primary in Wrath effects and 'fair' effects that hurt both players "equally", which have been part of white since Alpha which Renounce the Guilds is a variant of. An Innocent Blood is a just a cheaper Wrath of God variant, which is a white effect. White can't have targeted unconditional creature removal but "removing both sides creatures 'equally'" is in whites slice of the colour pie. I view white has having as much right to access Barter in Blood as black has to Damnation.
-The actual problem I'm interested in "Is conspire Innocent Blood on the same level as conspire Raise Dead/Disturbing Plot". While 2-for-ones shouldn't be common, Barter in Blood is only that if you have no creatures and your opponent has two. If this card was black few black decks would pick it over Batter in Blood out of fear of getting 3-for-2ed. Bone Shards isn't a limited bomb and I don't think this that much better.
If white wants to kill everything because it's super evil, then it's not probably not white. Ponder the motivations.
Black, where this effect belongs in the pie, gets Barter in Blood at uncommon. This is effectively better than that in most cases, it's off-color, and it's common. I note that World Queller is both rare and a very odd effect. For that matter, Renounce the Guilds is rare as well.
A simple effect. While allowing red to destroy a subset of creatures and enchantments is a minor bleed, this a flavour win. The ability to destroy snow permanents feels red, hasn't been placed in the colour pie and being cold based gives something to interact with. So long as there are no red/colourless ways to turn something snow, this should be fine. (costed as a modern land destruction spell). -I am aware of http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/139648763453/could-red-in-theory-get-destroy-target-snow.
Promotes both a white suicide Aggro deck and slower Snow Control deck in limited. Reprint.