Seems like a fine card, but there is no common lands, right? i thought they did uncommon occassionaly, rare for duals and such and mythics too. i've never seen a common land.

tbh i just need to fit in some commons w/o wrecking the nice amounts of colored cards

yea but it doesnt happen lul

many lands are common like both Zendikar blocks hae a common cycle, and the bounce lands on ravnica. Im pretty sure gates are common too. There are aslo the Tarkir block common gainlands (i think theyre called taht) and more, but thats all i know rn. I just need a common man, plz? just 1 common??? help a brothur out? cmon just 1 common?

i have no sympathy for you, but since you say there are previous common lands then it's fine. I was ignorant of that.

Now we just need ": Create a 1/1 treefolk token" and we're golden :)

Funny-lands need to go at common in sets like Zendikar, which are land-focused. And if you have a whole load of them (Ravnica had, what, two full cycles of ten?) then common's a good place.
It's unusual to put lands at common, but it's certainly legal, if you have a good reason.

There's 137 of them total. For reference.

This card falls under the 'strictly better Forest' category. Incidentally missing the basic type is not seen as a factor when determining that. The reasons not to run this card over a basic Forest card are too minor. It should have a drawback of some sorts.

Maybe ETBs tapped?

this also feels very forest-y?

tree = forest.

maybe it shoudl have the subtypew?