Yomama's custom cards: Recent Activity

Yomama's custom cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Recent updates to Yomama's custom cards: (Generated at 2026-10-11 18:56:47)

• 2017-03-20 00:10:55: Yomama edited Roots of Boseiju
• 2017-03-20 00:10:22: Yomama commented on Sarah, the Ransom-Taker

  Thanks, I'm not very good at rules text.

• 2017-03-20 00:10:02: Yomama edited Sarah, the Ransom-Taker
• 2017-03-20 00:08:00: Yomama edited Roots of Boseiju
• 2017-03-17 13:56:55: jmgariepy commented on Roots of Boseiju

  Compare to Drumhunter? I know they do very different things. But both cards feel like creatures with strong abilities with tacked on mana effects that play into what they do...

• 2017-03-17 11:07:14: Alex commented on Roots of Boseiju

  I like this effect a lot (Boseiju, Who Shelters All having been an important part of one of the very few Standard decks I've played in my 18 years of MtG). But 5 mana for a 0/3 feels really anaemic. I think it could be cheaper and/or much bigger, compared to Vine Trellis/Overgrown Battlement.

• 2017-03-16 13:43:34: Vitenka commented on Sarah, the Ransom-Taker

  Or a Ghostly Prison varition? "Each creature attacking you is blocked unless its owner discards a card" ?

• 2017-03-16 06:00:42: SecretInfiltrator commented on Sarah, the Ransom-Taker

  An attacker is classified as "blocked" or "unblocked" based on decisions made during "Declare Blockers step" while the ability already triggers during "Declare Attackers step".

  The only consistent way to interpret this card text is to say a creature is "unblocked" unless otherwise blocked making the word "unblocked" superfluous since they couldn't have been blocked by the time this triggers.

  ---

  Alternatively: "Whenever a creature an opponent controls attacks and isn't blocked, that player discards a card."

• 2017-03-16 03:15:21: Yomama edited Sarah, the Ransom-Taker
• 2017-03-16 03:15:01: Yomama edited Sarah, the Ransom-Taker
• 2017-03-16 03:14:54: Yomama edited Sarah, the Ransom-Taker
• 2017-03-16 03:14:46: Yomama edited Sarah, the Ransom-Taker
• 2017-03-16 03:04:51: Yomama edited Sarah, the Ransom-Taker
• 2017-03-15 23:50:03: Yomama edited Roots of Boseiju
• 2017-03-15 23:29:51: Yomama deleted the card Blightning Rod from Yomama's custom cards
• 2017-03-15 22:56:46: Yomama edited a card
• 2017-03-15 22:56:39: Yomama created a card
• 2017-03-15 21:04:08: Yomama edited Roots of Boseiju
• 2017-03-15 20:46:07: Yomama edited Roots of Boseiju
• 2017-03-15 20:45:34: Yomama created the card Roots of Boseiju
• 2017-03-15 20:34:39: Yomama edited a card
• 2017-03-15 20:30:55: Yomama edited a card
• 2017-03-15 20:28:56: Yomama edited a card
• 2017-03-13 21:36:23: Yomama edited Landscar Worm
• 2017-03-13 21:35:58: Yomama edited Sarah, the Ransom-Taker
• 2017-03-13 21:34:48: Yomama edited Landscar Worm
• 2017-03-13 00:16:58: Yomama edited Koji, Comet from the Veil
• 2017-03-13 00:15:53: Yomama edited Sarah, the Ransom-Taker
• 2017-03-13 00:11:09: kauefr commented on Landscar Worm

  I believe the correct templating is: "Whenever Landscar Worm attacks, target player sacrifices a land."

  Or: "Whenever Landscar Worm attacks, defending player sacrifices a land."

  BUT... Repeatable Land Destruction at common is a no-no.

• 2017-03-12 21:06:46: Yomama edited Landscar Worm