Creatures/Enchants instead of 'Walkers: Comments

Creatures/Enchants instead of 'Walkers: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

on 10 Jan 2016 by Link:

Planeswalkers are definitely an established card type by this point, especially since they've been around for the entire time lots of players have known the game (myself included).
I would also like to point out that it's very strange to see 'walkers labeled as "non-interactive," since enchantments and noncreature artifacts are inherently worse in that department.

on 10 Jan 2016 by NymphadoraTonks:

Yeah, my other cube aficionados pointed this out as well. Creatures are really a better fit flavor-wise and depth-of-interactions-wise. Check out the discussion here if you'd like!: http://riptidelab.com/forum/threads/old-schoolify-planeswalkers-by-turning-them-into-a-normal-card-type.1134/

Post your comments on Creatures/Enchants instead of 'Walkers here!
If your comments are on a small number of specific cards, they may be better added to those cards. This is for comments on the set as a whole.


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
How much damage does this card deal? Searing Wind
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)