Doesn't tap for . 2/5 stars

should this be colorless?

I also don't really get how a land destroys other lands, i guess cause its big but ehhhh

i think making it more mountainy would be cool too but thats just a path choice, not worth taking \stars\ off imo

should probably be an elemental. I don't think any color gets trample and indestructible, carrot me if i am rawng

I was goofing. Green gets trample and indestructible, so this should be G or RG

Well, I would recommend , but by WotC standards this is quite fine since is actually and colorless cards can do pretty much anything they want (we have multiple Vindicates at around ), especially when they cost a lot of mana and are mythics. Ie. Darksteel Colossus and Colossus of Akros. Big stuff tend to get trample regardless of color as well. Then there's this concept of "artifact/colorless pie" where probably darksteel stuff exists not only in flavor, but in mechanics as well, so indestructible is likely stated to be a thing there... As for land destruction, we did have Sundering Titan and since colorless can destroy permanents of any type it shouldn't be much of a stretch it to bomb lands as well.

This "colorless pie" is kind of nonsense since we're technically talking about hybridiest of hybrid mana that can be paid with either , , , , , or (and the cards also feature the devoid keyword and/or colorless color indicator). You certainly wouldn't make this cost yet that is a more restrictive subset of . If we were talking about " / true colorless pie" instead we would be somewhere, but instead = as long as there aren't any colors in the mana cost.

/ rant

I'd buy it if it was a land in some way and lost the extranous aspects and overall were a different card. So, dude1818 is right in that regard: There is a path for this name to do something expected yet clever and it... doesn't, so mediocrity is its fate.

its now

also changed stats a bit too

guys i actually understood what everyone said there, i'm evolving!