Um. 2/1 unblockable, and if they kill it you can... do something pointless and fiddly, and turn 2 cards into a new card to deal 3 damage to them.

Needs to be kinda costly I guess? I'm not getting the point of "Scorched earth" used here.

It's probably important to point out Scorched Earth can be responded to. So, if I discard two cards and give this to my opponent, he can respond, after gaining control of this creature, by discarding two cards and giving it right back. That's going to be a strange scenario when both players are at less than three life and have 2 or more cards in hand... you can't give it to your opponent, or you'll lose the game.

So... 2/1 Intimidate = about . Discard two cards, draw a card switch control of permanent and deal 3 damage in the process. Umm... I'm not sure. Maybe ? The opponent does get the option to send it right back to you... this should more often be used as "Sacrifice this creature: Win the game if your opponent is at 3 or less life." But could pop up in emergency situations... and the intimidate isn't going to work very well against a red player. 1RR if you're going for tier 1 card, 3R if you want fair, I suppose.

Oh, and I'm not big on correcting spelling, but 'looses' drives me nuts. It should be 'loses'... and no, that doesn't make sense considering how it's pronounced.

Oh ew at the pass back and forth thing.

I really don't think that kind of fiddly complexity belongs in a keyword.

Hihi, didn't intend to make cards that can go back and forth with scorched earth but I like the idea. But for this cards sake I'll remove it and work out another one where this may feel better than here.