Mirroria: Recent Activity
Mirroria: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Additions to Comp Rules | Style Guide | Art Descriptions |
Recent updates to Mirroria: (Generated at 2024-05-04 22:53:09)
Mirroria: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Additions to Comp Rules | Style Guide | Art Descriptions |
Recent updates to Mirroria: (Generated at 2024-05-04 22:53:09)
why were there two monoblue walkers in this set with the same + ability
flip walker tech
Oh hey, jmg came up with meld!
Yeah, see what I did with Restless Undead and friends. The point of this card set was to explore a high-concept TDFC-only set
MDFC now cover that design space, but an Adventure/Aftermath-style frame could easily make such a design possible on a SFC. It could be done and a lot of holy cows have been butchered since the original evoke-discussion. Nowadays it's more a matter of graphic design (for what it's worth: aftermath frame was mostly fine, too.)
Adventures aren't split cards. The mini-card representing the adventure only exists on the stack, unlike split cards, where both sides exist everywhere other than the stack. You could certainly make a riff on adventure where the mini-card needs to be cast from the graveyard
With the advent of Adventures, why can't Aftermath have the top half be a creature?
Hmm, yeah, reminds me of that whole thing where originally evoke was supposed to be split instant/creatures or whatever. This old post on mtg salvation seems quite confident that it could be done with minor modifications but I do recall MaRo stating he was repeatedly convinced not to try that. Eh.
You can't put aftermath on a permanent card
To me this looks like it wants to use Aftermath.