Soradyne Laboratories v1.2: Recent Activity

Soradyne Laboratories v1.2: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Mechanics | Skeleton

Recent updates to Soradyne Laboratories v1.2: (Generated at 2025-08-18 17:18:50)

• 2012-04-10 23:57:39: SFletcher edited Recall Drone
• 2012-04-10 21:43:13: SFletcher edited Pull of the Familiar
• 2012-04-10 21:42:19: SFletcher edited Pull of the Familiar
• 2012-04-10 19:20:06: SFletcher edited No Footprints
• 2012-04-10 19:14:41: SFletcher edited Venerate
• 2012-04-10 18:44:29: Bombshell commented on Venerate

  Given what you're doing, why provide hexproof? Pro-x and indestructability really cover those bases.

  Also 'protection from types' is unclear.

• 2012-04-10 17:43:55: SFletcher edited Grounding Theory
• 2012-04-10 17:35:15: M_Houlding commented on Pull of the Familiar

  I think you can shorten this a little to:

  "Reveal the top 3 cards of your library. Put a creature card from among them into your hand, then put the rest into your graveyard. If that card is a Wizard card, put a 1/1 green Snake creature token onto the battlefield."

• 2012-04-10 17:31:00: M_Houlding commented on No Footprints

  Change "have" to "gain".

• 2012-04-10 16:49:20: SFletcher edited Pull of the Familiar
• 2012-04-10 16:46:59: SFletcher edited Research Coordinator
• 2012-04-10 16:17:34: SFletcher edited Behavioral Modification Trial
• 2012-04-10 16:00:49: SFletcher edited Refile
• 2012-04-10 15:56:16: SFletcher edited No Footprints
• 2012-04-10 05:17:22: M_Houlding commented on a card
• 2012-04-10 04:29:23: SFletcher commented on a card
• 2012-04-10 03:39:33: SFletcher edited Venerate
• 2012-04-10 03:34:54: SFletcher edited Venerate
• 2012-04-10 03:20:40: M_Houlding commented on a card
• 2012-04-10 03:18:12: M_Houlding commented on Venerate

  I think you're trying to hard to make it "all upside" and going for an absurd "eye for an eye" gusto. There's no real way to abbreviate the concept as is (that I can think of), but one possible solution is to change all of the non-eye for and eye stuff into:

  Until end of turn, target permanent gains protection from the colors and types of your choice and is indestructible.

  After that, you have weird Teferi's Response effects that scale according to how many spells were targeting your permanent before you cast Venerate, except not everyone knows that spells and abilities are being countered when the thing they target is no longer a legal target. So, as cool as the concept is, I'd recommend you rethink its inclusion.

  And that Evidence trigger? Not cutting it.

• 2012-04-10 02:30:32: SFletcher created a card
• 2012-04-10 02:09:42: SFletcher commented on Venerate

  I suspect there's a shorter way to do this, but I think you get the idea.

• 2012-04-10 02:09:01: SFletcher edited Venerate
• 2012-04-10 02:07:58: SFletcher edited Venerate
• 2012-04-10 01:57:57: SFletcher created the card Venerate
• 2012-04-10 01:44:11: SFletcher created a card
• 2012-04-09 21:49:20: Bombshell commented on Uncertainty Principle

  It's also not as cheap, so there's a chance for people to play the game in the meantime.

• 2012-04-09 20:42:20: M_Houlding commented on Uncertainty Principle

  Certainly less annoying than Counterbalance, as it doesn't interact with Scry or Sensei's Diving Top in any appreciable manner. Not to mention Top is really the only reason Counterbalance was annoying in the first place, as Top is probably the most annoying card in existence.

• 2012-04-09 20:26:16: SFletcher commented on Uncertainty Principle

  Yes, this is an obvious Counterbalance variant. It mills and creates an intersecting tension though, so I think ir's worth looking at.

• 2012-04-09 20:21:00: SFletcher created the card Uncertainty Principle