My First Set

My First Set by alvoi

38 cards in Multiverse

18 commons, 12 uncommons, 6 rares, 2 mythics

38 white

15 comments total

My First Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Add a comment on this cardset

Recently active cards: (all recent activity)

Ce648aa3 098b 4af0 a433 fd290bc85904
Each player chooses a number of lands they control equal to the number of lands controlled by the player who controls the fewest, then sacrifices the rest. Players discard cards and sacrifice creatures the same way.
Illus. Kev Walker
last 2019-08-13 14:10:21 by Tahazzar
A9757246 e782 4d7a 8273 d9efe284edaf
Creature – Cat
Illus. Wisona Nelson
last 2019-08-12 21:21:18 by dude1818
6dd1a7fc 5dbd 4ed2 9b02 9fd5c55bb629
Creature – Human Knight
Other creatures you control get +1/+1.
Illus. Mark Zug
C3ac419f 7630 48c7 9039 88ce28898b6d
Creature – Angel
At the beginning of your upkeep, you may create a 1/1 white Spirit creature token with flying.
Illus. Jason Chan
43ec71e9 0024 4f8f b499 541fb7607fcd
Creature – Human Soldier
{t}: Destroy target creature with power 4 or greater.
Illus. Greg Hildebrandt

Recent comments: (all recent activity)
On Balance:

How about a 'walker such as Serra the Benevolent? Cataclysm perhaps? Humility xD? Balancing Act is reasonable as well if you ask me - at least more so than Balance. Strangely all these suggestion are hitting the {2}{w}{w} cost...

This might be a fine opportunity to design a custom card btw.

On Balance:

Yeah, you're right. Do you have some suggestions? I'm looking for iconic cards that are also good in limited

On Balance:

Ok, lol, well Armageddon is certainly it's own kind of insanity. Given all the other cards in the set, they both seem a bit out of place if you ask me.

On Balance:

I don't know, I wasn't sure if include it was the right thing. The doubt was between this and Armageddon

On Balance:

I want to say "balanced" is one of the few things it is not :)

I honestly don't know what this would be like in the current environment though. While at the time it made sense for it to be got rid of; is it now a problem? Maybe not, it's not like weenie decks that only need to play two lands are facingoff against combo decks that run no creatures any more.

On Balance:


A bold include. This card is a lot of things.

You could have gone for Balancing Act or even Magus of the Balance.

On Savannah Lions:

This was a tier one aggro card, back in Alpha. That's why it was printed at rare

On Savannah Lions:

They indeed do. It's just a sign of how creatures have crept over the years :)

On Savannah Lions:

If Dauntless Bodyguard is an uncommon than this can be a common. Also I'm a firm believer that creatures without rules text should have slightly buffed power or toughness compared to their cost.

On Savannah Lions:

2/1s for {w} even in Standard have been demoted to uncommon for a while. As sommons in a Standard set they'd still be top-notch, but not unthinkable.

The flavor text reminds me of an old tradition where every set or block had a four-letter flavor text e. g. Ray of Command says "Heel." IIRC.

(All recent activity)
See other cardsets