[FEATURE] Periodica
[FEATURE] Periodica by Froggychum
133 cards in Multiverse
47 commons, 65 uncommons, 18 rares, 3 mythics
3 colourless, 1 colourless white, 11 white, 15 blue, 10 black, 15 red,
10 green, 16 multicolour, 8 hybrid, 3 split, 36 artifact, 5 land
48 comments total
Trying to turn the periodic table and other chemical goodness into a set, maybe functional maybe not. Let's hope i can still remember anything from chem :)
[FEATURE] Periodica: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics |
Cardset comments (2) | Add a comment on this cardset
Recently active cards: (all recent activity)




Good Guy, Germanium here with another solution to world hunger!



Semiconductor of Germanium costs
more to cast for each artifact you control.
Equip artifact
or
: Merge equipped artifact with another artifact equipped by Semiconductor of Germanium. Then, exile all equipments on those permanents. As long as they are merged, they both can be tapped to add 
.

Equip artifact





When Zinc Tablets enters the battlefield, remove all counters from target permanent.
Evoke
(You may cast this spell for its evoke cost. If you do, it's sacrificed when it enters the battlefield.)
Evoke


Gallium Falls enters the battlefield tapped unless an artifact left the battlefield this turn
,
: Add 
or 
. Spend this mana only to cast artifact spells or spells that reference artifacts.






Recent comments: (all recent activity)
See other cardsets
i have another semester in chemistry rn lol... still this place might never get finished.
It didn't feel like a sorcery. But yeah, I'll make it a sorcery
So... how do you justify this not being a sorcery?
Yeah lol
Cop-per
I know. I couldn't find a middle ground. Maybe graveyard? but that wouldn't work in every deck. And I don't want to limit the colors this appears in... Target graveyard? that is bound to work often.
Note - previously this was exile from hand. A major cost. Exiling from library is a much more minor cost, almost free.
thank you :)
I think it would be "of spells you cast this turn," but it seems right
No, the card disadvantage makes it totally unplayable