Decipher: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
CardName: Doubtcaster's Bolt Cost: {1}{PB}{R} Type: Instant Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Choose one: Doubtcaster's Bolt deals 3 damage to target creature. Doubtcaster's Bolt deals 3 damage to target player. If {B} was spent to cast Doubtcaster's Bolt, that player discards a card. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Decipher None |
Code: History: [-] Add your comments: |
Just to be certain: If the first mode is chosen, then no one discards any cards, even if black mana was paid?
That's a weird wording. The first clause seems completely subsumed into the second one, unless there's ever some reason to damage someone but not force them to discard. A madness set maybe?
But even then, a 'may' is probably simpler.
I think V missed that the first mode hits only creatures and the second mode hits only players.
I can definitely see the appeal in a split card of Blightning / Lightning Strike. It's a little fiddly to word, though.
Super mechanical and very inelegant if not just plain ugly design. I have a hard time seeing an environment in which this would see print. Time Spiral 2 block?
Maybe just go with something like (wording tips from Chain of Plasma):
> Sorcery?
> ~ deals 3 damage to target creature or player, then you may pay . If you do, that player or that creature's controller discards a card.
or
> Instant
> ~ deals 3 damage to target creature or player. If was spent to cast ~, that player or that creature's controller discards a card.
Kicker obviously also works.
Maybe "~ deals 3 damage to target creature or player. If it dealt damage to a player and was spent to cast it, that player also discards a card"?
But still a little fiddly.