Namekkos: Recent Activity
Namekkos: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Political Groups | Locations | Naming Convention | Limited archetypes | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Namekkos: (Generated at 2025-08-18 05:31:05)
Oh yeah. There was probably supposed to be a "your opponents control" in there somewhere. Also, I came nowhere close to finishing this set, so maybe I would've fleshed out that theme more, who's to say
Doesn't really feel like something you'd waste an enchantment slot on casting, though? since there's not really any way to manipulate the cost of things in your library, there's not really any sensible way to turn it towards hurting your opponent more than you? And, well, it's going to hit your most common mana costs most often - which means a lot of planning around just trying to play it. For the cost, it feels like it should be a lot better. Unless the intent is "Build a no-creatures deck", but the cardlist in this set doens't support that in white - you only have two instants and one other enchantment to play.
That wouldn't be breaking the color pie. Sure, the colors would play differently in this specific environment, but for the game as a whole it would do nothing.
It would however give some functional meaning and distinction for the 'everything is artifacts now' factor which will otherwise indeed remain a mere gimmick.
I didn't actually want to break the color pie by letting the colors deal with things they're not supposed to just because they're artifacts now. So I don't want Shatter if I can help it. I tried having more interactions with artifacts that worked with creature and noncreature artifacts in interesting ways. This set was definitely a gimmick set, where I had a cool idea for a world and challenged myself to see how it would turn out.
Borrowing from Nahiri, the Harbinger
Clarified
What we're missing is that I didn't bother reading Narcolepsy. I assumed you were suggesting Claustrophobia.
Nope!