The Fading Aurora: Recent Activity
| The Fading Aurora: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to The Fading Aurora: (Generated at 2025-12-14 02:33:39)
| The Fading Aurora: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to The Fading Aurora: (Generated at 2025-12-14 02:33:39)
Standalone. I think you’re right that splitting Aspects and Nodes between sets woild work, but the longer I’ve looked at Nodes, the more I’d just prefer they worked like/as Aspects.
Was this to be a standalone set or a block? I can't recall if that was ever mentioned. If the aspects and nodes remain challenging maybe you could distribute them so that one of them appears here and the other on the following set?
I would recommend keeping the general complexity very low and then increasing it after awhile if the set starts to feel like it needs some of that extra "spice".
I debated whether she needed Defender, but with the 0 power it seemed like it was missing. Might be simpler to give it a 1 power.
The Aspect wording is definitely a pain, and of all the things I’m building into the set design, that’s the one I want to iron out most. I agree with you on the nodes, and if I can streamline the Aspects, I’ll switch the nodes over to match.