Desert Frontier: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton | Mechanical Themes | Creative Themes | TODO |
CardName: Fool's Gold Deposit Cost: Type: Land Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: {T}: Add {1} to your mana pool. {T}, sacrifice Fool's Gold Deposit: Add one mana of any colour to your mana pool. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Desert Frontier Uncommon |
Code: UL01 Active?: true History: [-] |
I want mana fixing to be enough to regularly splash something, but only limitedly, hence the sacrifice.
I need to have some better mana fixing in green.
Nice: you redesigned Archaeological Dig by accident :)
Thank you! Oops, although MR says it always happens to them too, so I guess I should stop worrying about it :) I may reprint archaelogical dig, it fits the flavour fairly well.
BTW, how come you can see this? I thought I set desert frontier to be all owner-only? (I don't mind you looking, I'd quite like feedback from a couple of people, but I wanted to get some things roughed out before throwing it open to nitpicks from everyone.)
It is indeed owner-only (that's what the red background to the set views box above means). I'm just nosily cheating using my super admin powers. I, er, guess I should sortof apologise.
If anyone really wants me to keep out of their private sets I will, but I tend to be interested in what people are using Multiverse for (and reckon it'll help me make it better if I have more idea what people use it for) so I tend to take a peek into sets that people are working on, even if they're private.
LOL. Yes, that's what I thought, it's fine. You're welcome to comment on Desert Frontier, I think you can see what sort of stage it's at -- I'd actually appreciate any general comments on cards before I try to balance them. And I think it's useful to see what people are doing so you can see how multiverse is used.
But I think etiquette suggests you start the first comment with "I hope you don't mind if I comment..." or similar, just to establish the boundary still exists :)
That's a good point. I think I have done that in the past and forgot to here. My apologies!
Although in fact, maybe you said that to me on another set and I forgot, that's also quite likely :)