The problem with that is that the various cards that are attached to objects have a wide variety of flavor reasons behind them so finding a single term to describe that quality of being attached or having attached permanents is hard.
I think "adorned" was used as a pseudo keyword for a creature that was enchanted and/or equipped, but there it can be seen how specific the flavor ends be. It wouldn't be a fit for Component artifacts and probably not for Fortifications either. Nor for Curses.
Hmm, oh, you even mentioned that "adorned". Yeah it was used in that Norse set in planesculptors at one point or another.
Anyway, while "attached" is a pretty sterile word, it doesn't bring up all the confusion the term "stack" has related to it. So it's even used for reminder texts of Auras and such without any major issues as far as I know.
Personally I don't see this as a large enough of a problem to call for a modification.
I always wanted a term to describe permanents/objects that have permanents attached to them - a generelization of "enchanted", "equipped" e. g. "Destroy target adorned permanent."
"Attached" is just a too mechanical term that I want to avoid in card text like "stack" and "zone".
-sand type
-sand type
-Arctic subtype
-sand type
+Sand type
+sand type
+arctic subtype
+sand type
instant -> sorcery
added the mana ability
card design by foo_intherain
http://www.planesculptors.net/set/clockwood
card design by foo_intherain
http://www.planesculptors.net/set/clockwood
'reach' with a lowercase
The problem with that is that the various cards that are attached to objects have a wide variety of flavor reasons behind them so finding a single term to describe that quality of being attached or having attached permanents is hard.
I think "adorned" was used as a pseudo keyword for a creature that was enchanted and/or equipped, but there it can be seen how specific the flavor ends be. It wouldn't be a fit for Component artifacts and probably not for Fortifications either. Nor for Curses.
Hmm, oh, you even mentioned that "adorned". Yeah it was used in that Norse set in planesculptors at one point or another.
Anyway, while "attached" is a pretty sterile word, it doesn't bring up all the confusion the term "stack" has related to it. So it's even used for reminder texts of Auras and such without any major issues as far as I know.
Personally I don't see this as a large enough of a problem to call for a modification.
I always wanted a term to describe permanents/objects that have permanents attached to them - a generelization of "enchanted", "equipped" e. g. "Destroy target adorned permanent."
"Attached" is just a too mechanical term that I want to avoid in card text like "stack" and "zone".
Relevant threads
Yes, these all are variations on snow mana pretty much. Snow is actually included here. Note that the traditional five basic lands aren't.
> Dune, Wreck, Aether, Arctic, Monument
card design by ?? (MTG Salvation)
card design by ?? (MTG Salvation)
card design by Compleated Phelddagrif (MTG Salvation)
Huh, yellow mana. Nice to see you , been while.
No real colour identity though. Seems like this is more like snow mana than a colour of itself.