So Ling 素靈: Recent Activity
So Ling 素靈: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton | So Ling Block Overview | Planeswalker's Guide to So Ling 素靈 |
Recent updates to So Ling 素靈: (Generated at 2025-08-18 13:40:51)
...No, you're not. Why do you think that?
i'm increasing the amount of interactions
So why are you preventing that interaction?
Trust me, billions of casual players around the world giggle with glee when they encounter such cute interactions.
That's a very small corner case. Removing that line of text will simplify the rules text with very little change to the function. I believe Mark Rosewater, like myself, would tell you that's a good thing.
It's very likely. Consider you have cast a

enchantment called Conspiracy and name Sliver. Then you play a bunch of Slivers that grant activated abilities. But you also like this Golem because it's 4/4 for only
and it has a cool name. But don't forget you also need Auras or Equipment in order for the Golem to actually work. So you must also include some A&E; make sure to attach them to the Golem and not the other Slivers (the Golem is also a Sliver due to Conspiracy.)
Just in case it gains ... facepalm It would gain them via an aura or equipment. It should probably keep it anyway.
Edit: Link responded to himself before I could. I feel like that's cheating.
And it's unlikely to have any without equipment or auras.. which makes a bunch of useless text.
But it has no activated abilities.
cf. Training Drone
black enchantment destruction is not unprecedented Quagmire Druid, Choice of Damnations, Curse of the Cabal, Dystopia, Greater Harvester, Liliana of the Veil, Phyrexian Obliterator, Undercity Plague,
More worrisome to me is that this is sorta kinda sideways black enchantment destruction.