Harrenswich: Recent Activity
| Harrenswich: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton | Harrenswich Map | Lore Notes |
Recent updates to Harrenswich: (Generated at 2026-06-15 09:35:37)
| Harrenswich: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton | Harrenswich Map | Lore Notes |
Recent updates to Harrenswich: (Generated at 2026-06-15 09:35:37)
1: The ability isn't a mana ability for flavor reasons. 2: I don't know. Can you respond to mana abilities? Would tapping the equipped creature in response to an opponent tapping a land for mana cause an additional mana to be added from that land? If yes, then you could add mana to the opponent's mana pool. If not, this card could not add mana directly to the opponent's mana pool, although you could still target an opponent's land.
So, I thought that was a rare slot. Whoops!
That ability isn't a mana ability for some reason. I don't see why.
Is this supposed to be able to add mana to another player's mana pool?
A plow is a fun concept for an Equipment.
Seems extremely cheap. Just putting a counter on a single creature would cost as much on an uncommon and these keywords are easy to come by if any is enough. Maybe if it was "each creature with the chosen keyword that hasn't a +1/+1 counter on it".
This also seems like it shouldn't be instant speed at common.
(Double Post Deleted.)
[I] Intentionally skipped flash.
Halloweeny flavor text for today
Used Link's wording
It's a very cool concept.
It lets you make Icy Manipulators and Whispersilk cloaks instead of treasure tokens. (Or wasps)
It lets your artifact tokens enter as copies of other artifacts rather than what they would normally be.
You can't target inside a replacement effect, and you don't need to exclude the source of the replacement effect, so you can trim some of the words from this.
"If you would create an artifact token, you may create a token that's a copy of any artifact on the battlefield instead."
-or-
"If an artifact token would be created under your control, you may have that token enter the battlefield as a copy of any artifact on the battlefield."
Or some fusion thereof.
I read this wrong before, somehow I read it as:
Whenever an opponent plays an artifact, you may create a token copy of that artifact instead.
that's why i commented what i commented.
I don't understand what this does?
Neat!
to 
I should include a clause so it's only when you would create an artifact token. This only affects artifact tokens, so you'd need both artifacts and things creating artifact tokens to work.
Hm... this feels like nobody would play artifacts because they wouldn't get that artifact at all... maybe just allow it so both players get a copy, then, artifacts can stil be played, but are risky.
Just an idea. This is a cool card.