Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels: Recent Activity
| Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton | Archetypes | Flavor | 1st Playtest | 2nd Playtest | 3rd Playtest |
Recent updates to Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels: (Generated at 2025-11-10 14:17:09)
@SecretInfiltrator:
A.) Got it and updated it. Thx.
B.) Where are you getting this? So why are Containment Membrane and Aether Meltdown the way they are?
A.) The reminder text can lose "If you do, proclaim it." That's implicit.
Compare: You don't have "if you do, cycle it." on cards with cycling or "This creature exploits the sacrificed creature." on cards with exploit.
B.) Like miracle and similar "alternate use" mechanics, proclaim and its linked ability belong below the "on battlefield" abilities - enchant and "this happens to enchanted creature".
Order:
A card for the proclaim deck.
UU05 -> UU07
Naah, can't say I agree with you. IMO this mechanic is really asking for some super-evocation names such as:
> "When you proclaim The End is Near"
or
> "When you proclaim Imminent Victory"
Your templating would lose all those moments of pure flavor win. And for what?
EDIT: On further inspection, yes, it would save a crap ton of text space. I'll have to mull over this one...
Actually it doesn't save that much text, so I don't really think it's worth it (at least from that perspective). Plus, I'm not 100 % that it's worded correctly in that case (reminder texts are given much more leeway). I guess it ties better the cause and the effect, but eh.
See image with original & image as ability word
I think this Keyword really wants to be an Ability word:
"Proclaim - You may pay
and reveal this card as you draw it. If you do, tap target noncreature permanent."
CG11 -> CG10
CG10 -> CG09
There is indeed. I like the counterplays this currently enables, the quirky hate cards, and that it plays differently than just being legendary, so I've been keeping it as it is. I don't know though. It could be seen as a strong inconsistence. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
See the set's mechanics page for more about proclaim.
Unfortunately the must-have scry reminder takes a lot of space here. This also makes it so that there are now 3 cards in blue at common that have the mana cost of
:S
CU08 to CU06
Changed the illustration.
"it is" -> "it's"
With the new legend rules should this be legendary unless you control another permanent with the same name?
There is an argument either way.
"a library" -> "their library" and added the loss of 1 life.