Soradyne Laboratories v1.2: Recent Activity

Soradyne Laboratories v1.2: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Mechanics | Skeleton

Recent updates to Soradyne Laboratories v1.2: (Generated at 2025-08-18 20:03:43)

• 2012-03-31 13:00:20: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-31 12:56:09: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-31 12:54:51: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-31 12:50:40: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-31 12:49:09: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-31 12:48:47: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-31 12:47:48: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-31 12:40:06: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-31 12:39:48: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-31 01:42:54: M_Houlding commented on Adroit Safecracker

  Once you take some [Storyline Drug] it'll make more sense.

• 2012-03-30 22:04:28: SFletcher commented on Adroit Safecracker

  Dan, is that you?

• 2012-03-30 17:00:06: M_Houlding commented on Adroit Safecracker

  "Investigation indicates the suspect was after medical research data and shipping manifests for [Storyline Drug]."

  The current end of the sentence is overly vague, especially if this is somehow important to the story. We can either interpret "supplies" as being "medical supplies" or "random supplies", neither of which is really suggestive of why someone cares about what is in the safe. But give those supplies a name, and BAM! Our brains can start imagining what that Named Substance does and why someone cares where it got sent.

• 2012-03-30 16:07:24: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-30 16:05:43: SFletcher commented on Adroit Safecracker

  Fixed the flavor text. Surprisingly key to the story.

• 2012-03-30 16:05:07: SFletcher edited Adroit Safecracker
• 2012-03-30 15:51:28: SFletcher edited Woods’ Edge Bobcat
• 2012-03-30 15:50:47: M_Houlding commented on Woods’ Edge Bobcat

  I support that instinct.

• 2012-03-30 15:34:08: SFletcher commented on Woods’ Edge Bobcat

  The more I look at this card, the more I just want to make it some dumb vanilla creature.

• 2012-03-30 15:26:38: M_Houlding commented on Woods’ Edge Bobcat

  I think you just want "Target creature must be blocked by two or more creatures this turn if possible." As written, while Master Warcraft certainly exists, this falls into "too many words to describe a relatively mundane and infrequently relevant effect" territory.

• 2012-03-30 15:10:53: SFletcher edited Woods’ Edge Bobcat
• 2012-03-30 15:08:01: SFletcher edited Woods’ Edge Bobcat
• 2012-03-30 15:06:01: SFletcher commented on Woods’ Edge Bobcat

  And while true, I still wasn't happy with how it was working as a whole.

• 2012-03-30 15:02:20: SFletcher edited Woods’ Edge Bobcat
• 2012-03-30 13:47:59: Alex commented on Woods’ Edge Bobcat

  Nice card. I think it could be more simply worded, as per Hunt Down:

  > Choose one - Target creature blocks target creature this turn if able; or target creature can't block target creature this turn.

• 2012-03-30 13:13:42: SFletcher edited Tip Over
• 2012-03-30 00:36:44: SFletcher edited Woods’ Edge Bobcat
• 2012-03-29 14:28:14: SFletcher commented on Newbridge Detective

  It’s an entirely new kind of take on black life gain, but I don’t think it’s that much of a stretch. Black gets lifelink, it has Abattoir Ghoul, it has (or had) Drain Life. This vampire effectively drains information.

  This is the kind of “integrated vampire” I’ve been wanting to build. I feel like in the right society and under the right condition, there’s got to be situations where their abilities can be put to a productive use. They use their skills to their advantage, but aren’t necessarily (all) psycho-killers and criminals. They’re probably still cold and emotionless, but good at what they do.

• 2012-03-29 14:16:49: SFletcher edited Newbridge Detective
• 2012-03-29 14:16:25: SFletcher edited Newbridge Detective
• 2012-03-29 14:11:55: SFletcher edited Newbridge Detective