Multiverse

Silver bordered and/or joke cards

Silver bordered and/or joke cards by Jack V

147 cards in Multiverse

20 with no rarity, 43 commons, 31 uncommons,
31 rares, 19 mythics, 2 basics, 1 token

9 colourless, 13 white, 31 blue, 17 black, 17 red, 10 green,
29 multicolour, 2 hybrid, 3 split, 10 artifact, 5 land, 1 plane

422 comments total

A collecting ground for cards which are funny rather than useful; some would fit in an un-set, some are purely humour

Silver bordered and/or joke cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Cardset comments (6) | Add a comment on this cardset

The set creator would like to draw your attention to these comments:

On Silver bordered and/or joke cards (reply):

Also, Rourke's comment about this set being 'un-believable' made me think that is what this set (or the next Un-set Wizards does) should be called: Unbelievable.

Recently active cards: (all recent activity)

Legendary Creature – Jellyfish
Defender
{u}{u},{t}: Draw a few cards and then discard two cards. (A few cards can be any number from two to five.)
Coridra Few-Handed's toughness is equal to the number of cards in your hand. If Coridra's toughness is higher than six, bury Coridra.
2/*
3 comments
last 2015-03-24 17:39:31 by Acilper
 C 
Instant
Counter target spell. If that spell is countered this way, put it onto the stack instead of putting it into its owner's graveyard.
I think we can expect this to be the average power level for countermagic in the foreseeable future.
4 comments
last 2015-03-07 13:33:15 by jmgariepy
{w/b}{w/b}
 
 R 
Instant
Target player cannot concede the game this turn.
Draw a card.
"Suck it, comp. rule 101.1!"
—movezig5
14 comments
last 2015-03-05 05:19:17 by movezig5
 U 
Enchantment – Aura
Enchant creature
Enchanted creature is legendary and has horsemanship. (It can't be blocked except by creatures with horsemanship.)
Enchanted creature's expansion symbol becomes the symbol of the Portal: Three Kingdoms expansion.
1 comment
2015-03-02 19:34:12 by movezig5
 R 
Enchantment
Return all creatures to their owners' hands except for Krakens, Leviathans, Octopi, and Serpents.
"I can see why this appeals to grammar Nazis."
—Kiora
11 comments
last 2015-02-18 00:55:13 by movezig5

Recent comments: (all recent activity)
On Coridra Few-Handed:

Which I admit is a really bad reason, which is probably why I decided to do it in a Silver-Bordered card.

On Coridra Few-Handed:

Yeah, I'm well aware of that, but something in me just wanted it saw "bury" instead of sacrifice.

On Coridra Few-Handed:

Technically the rules don't apply to silver-bordered cards, but "bury" isn't actually a thing anymore. Nowadays, this card would say "sacrifice."

On Counter-Productive:

Two other scenarios this card might (maybe) matter:

You cast Annihilate on your opponent's Sea Troll. Your opponent sacrifices the doomed creature. Counter-Productive might allow you to reset the Annihilate and choose new targets.

You cast Sea Troll. Your opponent Spelljacks it (desperation makes you do funny things), and casts your Sea Troll on his turn. You Counter-Productive Sea Troll, re-gaining control of the spell in the process. Both players decide they've been playing Magic for too long tonight, and go home.

On Counter-Productive:

It reads to me like "move target spell to the top of the stack", so for example, Worldfire then respond with Shock then respond again by "countering" Worldfire and neatly tucking the Shock away until after Worldfire resolves, something you can't normally do with a sorcery.

Then again, if the zone "change" is to have any effect, the new version of the spell loses track of its targets, and just becomes an uninitialized spell on the stack. That's not a good thing to have.

On Counter-Productive:

I know that if you exile as exiled card, it becomes a new object in the exile zone. Maybe something like that happens?

On Counter-Productive:

Oddly, useful against cards with Flashback. And spells like Twincast. Scary that this could, in some strange theoretical environment, take up space in a pro-player's sideboard. Let's pretend I didn't mention any of this. :S

Unless... hmm... the spell doesn't appear to go anywhere when it's countered. It's just 'put onto the stack', but I guess it never left the stack, too? Huzzah! The card still sucks!

On Box In:

Just in case it isn't clear, I'd like to mention that I was fully aware that this card violated the rules when I made it. That's why I made it silver-bordered. Also, the flavor text directly mentions the rule that states that players can concede the game at any time--this is an exception to MtG's "golden rule" that states that a card's text takes precedence over the rules.

On Grammatically Hypercorrect Whelming Wave:

Maybe we should just name it "Ambiguity!" Oh wait...

On Grammatically Hypercorrect Whelming Wave:

A lot of this is very much in the air, especial octopuses/octopi, since the word 'octopi' was considered correct English for (I believe) centuries before it was officially corrected. Cactuses/cacti is also mentioned on this page at Oxforddictionaries.com ­

Seems Oxford thinks 'Cacti' is more correct. That said, while all of this is important to know, it's dangerous to correct others since the hypercorrect form is often technically 'correct' due to traditional usage.

(All recent activity)
See other cardsets