Misc Design for future sets.: Recent Activity

Mechanics

Recent updates to Misc Design for future sets.: (Generated at 2025-08-18 17:24:41)

2014-04-10 18:37:04: Vonmarcus created the card Final Burn
2014-04-10 18:22:07: Vonmarcus created the card Yotian Captian
2014-04-10 18:15:55: Vonmarcus created the card Fortified Tombs
2014-04-10 18:10:56: Vonmarcus edited Current Sifter
2014-04-10 18:09:21: Vonmarcus created the card Current Sifter
2014-04-10 13:53:27: Vonmarcus edited Stand Against
2014-04-10 13:53:10: Vonmarcus commented on Stand Against

Given that the power level of the effect has been all over the place I'm going to make it up to three target creatures. It should play well with things that care about being targeted.
2014-04-10 09:13:16: Vitenka commented on Stand Against

Well, on the flip side - Piety exists.

I'd say "Go ahead, make this "Creatures you control get +0/+5 UEOT" that feels closer to modern power. (Aven Warcraft for example, Bar the Door) - although, well, Akroma's Blessing is kinda the same but a heckofalot better usually.

...Steadfastness. The power level of this effect has been all over the map, hasn't it?
2014-04-10 01:34:15: Vonmarcus commented on Stand Against

Hmm Could it still be common if I make it able to target say up to three creatures?
2014-04-09 23:54:08: jmgariepy commented on Stand Against

I like ridiculously high toughness boosts. But Vitenka isn't wrong about 'indestructible' generally being better. Withstand Death costs , which means that this card is either too expensive, or you're intentionally making a 'bad' card.
2014-04-09 16:58:33: Vonmarcus commented on Stand Against

P/T switching is one thing to consider, another is anything that cares about toughness. Also I'd personally would like to be able to save a creature from damage but it still be killable.
2014-04-09 14:29:53: Vitenka commented on Tenacious Baloth

Pleasingly Stompy.
2014-04-09 14:14:04: Vonmarcus edited Tenacious Baloth
2014-04-09 14:12:21: Vitenka commented on Stand Against

Feels weak. I'd suggest going straight up for "Is indestructible" which seems a lot more exciting; unless you're going to have power/toughness switchers too.
2014-04-09 14:12:00: Vonmarcus created the card Tenacious Baloth
2014-04-09 14:11:04: Vonmarcus created the card Returning Pain
2014-04-09 14:07:08: Vonmarcus created the card Card33181
2014-04-09 14:00:15: Vonmarcus created the card Stand Against
2014-04-09 13:58:44: Vonmarcus created the card Card33179
2014-04-08 17:19:34: Vonmarcus edited Agro Drago
2014-04-08 02:15:40: Visitor commented on Agro Drago

This is that guy you know who is obsessed with dragons. Keep this thing rare.
2014-04-06 01:30:37: Vonmarcus edited Wave Wizard
2014-04-05 14:06:58: Vonmarcus created the card Wave Wizard
2014-04-05 14:01:20: Vonmarcus created the card Tainted Channeler
2014-04-05 14:00:24: Vonmarcus created the card Puresoul Cleric
2014-04-05 13:59:16: Vonmarcus created the card True Bond Druid
2014-04-04 16:40:59: Vonmarcus edited Guardian of the Faithful
2014-04-04 15:47:05: Vonmarcus edited Redding Shaman
2014-04-04 15:46:52: Vonmarcus commented on Redding Shaman

ok I can see that I'm ok with these guys just being color reduction.
2014-04-04 14:44:47: Alex commented on Redding Shaman

Technically, the last time each colour got cheap cost reduction for all its spells was the common Familiar cycle in Planeshift: Sunscape Familiar, Stormscape Familiar etc. It's just they were in adjacent colours. :)

Being rare wouldn't help, as rarity doesn't excuse colour pie violations except for a small handful of cases.

I don't actually mind "Red spells you cast cost less"; what's more out-of-pie is the ": Add " line, actually.