Hmm. So on turn 3 it's probably about an 8/8 or 10/10 or so. Very eggs-in-one-basket. Reminds me of Sire of Insanity and Mindslicer, but those affected all players (and were correspondingly much smaller).
The double-black makes it hard to splash into Pyromancer's Swath decks :o)
Source
Source
Being able to tap for itself is relevant and maybe not ideal. I'd rather increase the base stats instead from today's perpsective.
Source
To this day there has been according to my search not a single 2/3 creature printed with double strike.
Source
I am myself not a fan of individual points of damage prevention any more.
Source
Hello, there, Banisher Priest! ^^
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
I'll predict some raisd eye brows regarding this card. Be sure to read the source to get the full picture regarding this card's design.
Source
Hmm. So on turn 3 it's probably about an 8/8 or 10/10 or so. Very eggs-in-one-basket. Reminds me of Sire of Insanity and Mindslicer, but those affected all players (and were correspondingly much smaller).
The double-black makes it hard to splash into Pyromancer's Swath decks :o)
Source
I cannot recall what the original idea was except that I consider Recurring Nightmare too strong.
Source
This card has gone unevaluated for half a dozen years. And I really want to discuss the balance on this one. :)
Source
Source