Quinnesheen: Recent Activity

Quinnesheen: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Mechanics | Skeleton

Recent updates to Quinnesheen: (Generated at 2024-05-05 19:42:43)
Page 1 - Older activity

• 2023-08-28 09:53:40: Sorrow edited Beachemoth Kraken:

  "tap an island" to "Tap an untapped Island"

• 2020-06-09 11:42:38: Sorrow edited Hailstorm Elemental:

  fixed typos

• 2020-05-20 08:16:50: Sorrow edited Hoozti, the Geyser Springs:

  made it nonland permanent instead of permanent

• 2018-11-22 19:33:42: Sorrow edited Adhuir, Voidgaze:

  specified combat damage

• 2018-09-15 12:28:10: Sorrow edited Undending Flatlands:

  Grammatical corrections to flavor text.

• 2018-04-16 06:37:42: Vitenka commented on Societal Burdens

  Go back to good old janky unlimited style words?

  Creatures with counters don't untap unless their owner pays

• 2018-04-10 22:30:32: Sorrow commented on Societal Burdens

  Wow, I didn't think the ability would end up looking so inelegant. Oh well.

  Unrelated, where do you find all your art from? Your work makes me want to find art for my cards.

• 2018-04-10 22:29:03: Sorrow edited Societal Burdens
• 2018-04-10 05:44:45: Tahazzar commented on Societal Burdens

  I'm getting the impression that you would have to either pay for every creature or none of those creatures untap. I don't think that's the intent?

  +This probably doesn't work at all:

  > Untap step: No player receives priority during this step so spells or abilities cannot be played.

  The general trend with card concepts such as these seems to be:

  > Creatures with counters on them don't untap during their controllers' untap steps and have "At the beginning of your upkeep, you may pay . If you do, untap this creature."

• 2018-04-09 14:44:40: Sorrow edited Societal Burdens:

  Increased cost to untap to and added "for each creature" (which was always intended).

• 2018-02-21 23:06:25: Sorrow edited Unimpressive Display:

  Reduced CMC from 3 to 1.

• 2018-02-21 21:00:37: Sorrow edited Finishing Pummel:

  Added "you control"

• 2018-01-13 19:56:19: Sorrow edited Taste Sand:

  Swapped with (((Self-Inflicted Scars))) in Shattered Kingdom

• 2017-10-26 12:37:25: Sorrow commented on Epic Pollen

  Omen does something different. Scout is checking one card to reap a reward and allowing the card to be moved if the player wants as backup so a failed scout might not be as feel-bad. Omen wants to get more copies of your permanents to your hand, so it can check a greater number of cards. Thinking now, Omen could have been a good choice to use for the bgu mechanic in Diaspora, but I don't regret choosing Retrace.

• 2017-10-26 11:43:45: SecretInfiltrator commented on Epic Pollen

  I mean you already have omen, why both?

• 2017-10-25 14:55:40: Sorrow commented on Epic Pollen

  Scout was top-down. For what it's worth, I've never been a fan off scry, especially as an evergreen. Admittedly, the difference is minute, but to use scry instead cards could only use scry 1. That being said, a tweak towards Ixalan's Explore is something I considered since that mechanic appeared.

• 2017-10-25 14:51:22: Vitenka commented on Epic Pollen

  Is it me, or is Scout just a readged scry? Is it worth using up such a nice word for such a minor tweak on the ability?

  Interesting Fog variant, though.

• 2017-10-25 14:46:36: Sorrow edited Epic Pollen:

  Missing word added

• 2017-10-24 16:59:22: Sorrow edited Ambs Tombkeeper:

  Added cleric subtype

• 2017-10-24 16:59:06: Sorrow edited Ambs Tombkeeper
• 2017-10-24 16:58:55: Sorrow edited Ambs Tombkeeper:

  Fixed wording so the card should do something

• 2017-09-24 21:38:24: Sorrow edited Bloomfield:

  Looks for a land to be scouted instead of a creature as that felt more sensible given the name.

• 2017-09-24 21:36:25: Sorrow edited Predator Emerges
• 2017-09-11 21:48:49: Mal commented on Master of All Memories

  I think it's already mythic-feeling enough. The only reason to give it Hexproof is for EDH shenanigans (the main reason why people didn't like Izzet Chemister when it was spoiled was because it was removal bait). It's already Fork on a stick that has the possibility of being Wild Ricochet after exiling just one spell with it. Once you cast a spell with it, the sac effect guarantees value already. It's pretty much remove-or-die. I see no need for hexproof.

• 2017-09-11 19:54:32: Sorrow commented on Master of All Memories

  A friend suggested this creature have hexproof due to its rarity, thoughts?

• 2017-09-11 19:49:37: Sorrow commented on Scaldsight

  Changed "UEOT" to "until beginning of your next upkeep" at a friend's suggestion.

• 2017-09-11 19:48:30: Sorrow edited Scaldsight
• 2017-07-11 15:31:48: Sorrow edited Sword of the Crystal Order
• 2017-07-11 15:31:32: Sorrow edited Sword of the Crystal Order
• 2017-07-11 15:31:09: Sorrow edited Canoneers of the Crystal Order

Page 1 - Older activity