To be honest, I don't have a real problem with sticking the reminder text in the middle of the sentence. Wizards might find that irregular, but its grammatically correct, at least.
That said, Dude is probably right that this should just be a line break. There really isn't a need to make it all one sentence.
As for Circeus' third point, he's kind of right. That said, I don't have a problem with mechanical bleeds if its more prevalent in one color combination than another (4 green-white cards with chant, but only 1 blue-black card, for example). See also: Scry. Even then, I'd be careful of making the blue-black card one of the better chanters.
Also, this can't kill a creature you tap with the chant ability, since it isn't legal target. You'd want a wording more like that of Deathbringer Liege. "Chant.\n You may destroy target creature if it's tapped."
Is this supposed to be a Paralyzing Grasp/Pacifism-type aura (in the vein of Temporal Isolation) or a boosting aura? Because it utterly fails to do either job. For that effect, it could IMO easily cost . Otherwise, you've got a Ghostly Possession that allows trading when blocking.
facepalm Yes, I really, really do need to go over these more.
Since I don't think Magic needs a card worse than Moonlace, how about just reprinting it at common or uncommon?
To be honest, I don't have a real problem with sticking the reminder text in the middle of the sentence. Wizards might find that irregular, but its grammatically correct, at least.
That said, Dude is probably right that this should just be a line break. There really isn't a need to make it all one sentence.
As for Circeus' third point, he's kind of right. That said, I don't have a problem with mechanical bleeds if its more prevalent in one color combination than another (4 green-white cards with chant, but only 1 blue-black card, for example). See also: Scry. Even then, I'd be careful of making the blue-black card one of the better chanters.
Also, this can't kill a creature you tap with the chant ability, since it isn't legal target. You'd want a wording more like that of Deathbringer Liege. "Chant.\n You may destroy target creature if it's tapped."
1) I'm not sure you want to unrestrict Chant: reading it, it feels like it wants to have the Conspire "share a color with it" aspect.
2) Action words, unfortunately, must have their reminder text at the end of the paragraph, so you have to apste it separately on Multiverse.
3) I'm not sure chant wants to be in all colors: distributing +1/+1 counters is not usually found in
OR 
...
Is this supposed to be a Paralyzing Grasp/Pacifism-type aura (in the vein of Temporal Isolation) or a boosting aura? Because it utterly fails to do either job. For that effect, it could IMO easily cost
. Otherwise, you've got a Ghostly Possession that allows trading when blocking.
The word is "ostracize", and it's already a card. How about "Neuter"?
Thank you! I really do need to start looking these names up first, sorry.
Commons (and uncommons) introducing new keyword mechanics need reminder text. Also I fear the name Rite of Passage is taken.
This one seems a little off the color wheel, but not sure how to fix it.