SM Serious Card Dump: Recent Activity
| SM Serious Card Dump: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to SM Serious Card Dump: (Generated at 2026-01-01 09:39:51)
Page 1 - Older activity
Page 1 - Older activity
Cute!
Evidently they've decided this is monoblue, with the new Insidious Will.
Interesting.
Good way to become monarch early. That guy without blockers is the monarch.
The point of the cycle is that they're all big enough to give you a sizable 6-point trigger on casting.
I think this would love to be much cheaper in exchange of drawing if you DON'T scry.
Notably, it leads to less downtime spent shuffling for an opponent who uses fetchlands. After the most recent Pro Tour, the fact that it also subtly hoses
costs (despite looking like an enabler) was actually the main idea that led to its creation.
There's a bit of a quirk in that A can play one of these, then B can play one, and only B's lands end up "utopianized", bringing back shades of the Lin-Sivvi-era legend rule. Making that work more intuitively will require either a dummy land type (and Tower is of course already taken), or a longer and uglier template.
That's all that land should ever be doing.
So this is "Hey, I want 5-colour enable, and I'm willing to give it to everyone to get it" (with a splash of multiplayer politics). Which is... pretty awesome, but the downside probably balances it. Cool!
I guess this is a sideboardable card for those times when R&D mess up and print (bl)inkmouth. For that purpose, it'd be pretty painful to draw this in a starting hand, against most decks.
Yeah, this is very powerful indeed. Hoses Inkmoth Nexus/Mutavault etc, Kessig Wolf Run etc, Mishra's Workshop, Dark Depths, and so on; and unlike Strip Mine, one copy of this shuts down any number of those opposing ones and still makes mana for you.
Now yes, it does make it rather easier for the opponent to cast their splash or colour-intensive spells. But that seems like a minor price to pay. "Your lands are now very good at mana making, but THAT'S ALL THEY'RE DOING, OKAY?!?" :)
Mm. I assume you either play this if you're really hurting for the right mana, or if your opponent already has their colors on board, at which point it can only screw them up.
To be honest, I'm guessing this card would see play even if the first ability was "
: Add 
to your mana pool." I'm not sure about Standard... but a colorless version of this card would hit every Commander deck I own, and I'd include at least one copy in most Legacy decks. I really don't know enough about Modern, though, to know how likely it would be to pop up there...
Seems powerful.
Ah yes, sorry. Watermarks can be any colour density including solid, because I use the same field for the big bold mana symbols on basic lands like Mountain. So most normal watermarks need to be uploaded with a fairly high transparency (alpha about 0.2).
Is this actually correct use of
? This card doesn't have any 
in its cost - only 8 generic mana. I think Blasphemous Act is going to retain its old template, unlike Cloudpost and friends.
I came here to say what dude1818 said.
That's not what C means. No cost-reduction effect is being changed, because cost-reduction reduces generic cost. This can currently only make Kozilek cheaper.
update cards for C symbol
She certainly seems more interesting to play against than her original incarnation.
When you find out your liege has been a giant tentacle monster all along, wouldn't you be apt to fight on the "wrong" side the second time around?
I submitted it as a custom watermark consisting of the MBS expansion symbol, and didn't see anything at all on my side. Until a better solution can be found, I suppose the card can go without one.