Clockwork Wings: Recent Activity

Clockwork Wings: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Mechanics | Skeleton | Mechanic ideas - artifacts | Setting | Proxies for printing | Power sync | Decklists

Recent updates to Clockwork Wings: (Generated at 2025-08-09 05:50:29)

• 2011-01-04 13:34:49: Alex edited the details page Skeleton
• 2011-01-04 13:34:32: Alex edited the details page Skeleton
• 2011-01-04 13:27:26: Alex commented on the cardset Clockwork Wings

  Mmm, energy is a good plan.

• 2011-01-04 13:19:59: Alex edited the details page Skeleton
• 2011-01-04 13:19:43: Alex edited the details page Skeleton
• 2011-01-04 13:19:33: Camruth commented on the cardset Clockwork Wings

  I was going to suggest Energy & Energy Pool, myself but I was beaten to it.

• 2011-01-04 13:19:17: Alex edited the details page Skeleton
• 2011-01-04 13:19:09: Alex created the details page Skeleton
• 2011-01-04 13:13:18: Chris commented on the cardset Clockwork Wings

  Interesting. I hadn't actually noticed the overlap until you just mentioned it, which implies it isn't confusing.

  OTOH, you could always pick another synonym. Energy pool, perhaps?

• 2011-01-04 12:48:57: Alex commented on the cardset Clockwork Wings

  Do you think it'd be too confusing using the word "power" for [Steam], [Electrical] etc, when "power" already has a Magic meaning for a creature's attack strength? (Cf the two Magic uses of the word "counter", and the recent terminology change of "battlefield" and "cast" to avoid the duplication of the word "play".)

• 2011-01-04 12:47:06: Alex commented on Floating Fortress

  I wonder if it should have trample. Given its other mechanic it'd definitely work well with it, but I wonder if that might be a bit too good. Given there are cheap ways to drop artifacts onto the battlefield like Master Transmuter and Trash for Treasure, it probably would.

• 2011-01-04 12:04:38: Alex edited the details page Setting
• 2011-01-04 12:04:29: Alex edited a details page
• 2011-01-04 11:54:05: Alex edited the details page Setting
• 2011-01-04 11:53:00: Alex created the details page Setting
• 2011-01-04 11:46:55: Alex edited a details page
• 2011-01-04 08:50:55: Alex commented on Floating Fortress

  Heh, Behold the Power of Destruction? Yeah, I could go with that :)

• 2011-01-04 05:43:30: DrugsForRobots commented on Floating Fortress

  I can see the picture being that one from the archenemy set.

• 2011-01-02 09:05:05: Alex edited Floating Fortress
• 2011-01-02 09:05:05: Alex edited Floating Fortress
• 2011-01-02 09:05:05: Alex edited Floating Fortress
• 2011-01-02 09:02:53: Alex edited Ornithopter
• 2011-01-02 09:02:53: Alex edited Ornithopter
• 2011-01-02 09:02:53: Alex edited Ornithopter
• 2011-01-02 08:58:55: Alex commented on Doom Engine
• 2011-01-02 08:58:55: Alex commented on Doom Engine
• 2011-01-02 08:58:55: Alex commented on Doom Engine

  Mmm, 4 or 5 would probably be okay. It was just a guess at what'd be a fair cost; it's unknown yet how easily the "WUBRG" of powers will be to achieve. 6 feels a bit more "big scary artifact" to me. We can reexamine it once I've got a few more cards up.

• 2011-01-02 08:55:02: Alex commented on the cardset Clockwork Wings
• 2011-01-02 08:55:02: Alex commented on the cardset Clockwork Wings
• 2011-01-02 08:55:02: Alex commented on the cardset Clockwork Wings

  Nah, I only added the details pages after your last comments :) (And to type square brackets in comments, at the moment you have to escape them with backslashes: \[.)

  I was thinking I could make power work like you describe, but it’d be implicit in the definition of power (so probably in reminder text on all the commons and uncommons). I'm not sure the flavour benefit is worth the fiddliness, though.