CardName: 'Smite the Monstrous variant"
Cost: 3w
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh: /
Rules Text: Destroy target creature with power four or greater that
isn't four or more colours.
[Goldcycling]
Flavour Text:
Set/Rarity: Traveler Tales Common
'Smite the Monstrous variant"
C
Instant
Destroy target creature with power four or greater that isn't four or more colours.
[Goldcycling]
"Fewer than four colors" feels arbitrary and wonky. Even in this (or any) environment I have a hard time seeing it ever being that relevant of a restriction.
My idea was a "Four mana spell that destroys a creature with four + power unless it has four or more colours." , under the idea that using 4 repeatedly was more elegant.
And this is supposed to be "Four Colour Matters" set where players build decks to play four colour creatures is limited, so I am trying to make an environment where that restriction matters. (That's also why I'm trying to make Gold tokens a major mechanic.)
Also worth of note might be that having multiple not-so-simple-restrictions can have the Dead Ringers effect where it takes time to parse what the card actually does and the card comes off as extremely inelegant.
"Fewer than four colors" feels arbitrary and wonky. Even in this (or any) environment I have a hard time seeing it ever being that relevant of a restriction.
Noted:
My idea was a "Four mana spell that destroys a creature with four + power unless it has four or more colours." , under the idea that using 4 repeatedly was more elegant.
And this is supposed to be "Four Colour Matters" set where players build decks to play four colour creatures is limited, so I am trying to make an environment where that restriction matters. (That's also why I'm trying to make Gold tokens a major mechanic.)
I will consider cutting this card.
And thanks for the feedback.
Suure.
Also worth of note might be that having multiple not-so-simple-restrictions can have the Dead Ringers effect where it takes time to parse what the card actually does and the card comes off as extremely inelegant.
Understood.
I have changed it from "has fewer than that four colours" to "that isn't four or more colours".
Does this make the card more intuitive/elegant?