---
--- by biancospino
112 cards in Multiverse
85 with no rarity, 12 commons, 8 uncommons,
4 rares, 3 mythics
4 colourless, 18 white, 13 blue, 12 black, 11 red,
16 green, 17 multicolour, 3 hybrid, 11 artifact, 7 land
15 comments total
| ---: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recently active cards: (all recent activity)
Enchant creature.
When this enters, create a copy of enchanted creature except the copy has base power and toughness 1/1 and isn't legendary.
Aura swap
.
When this enters, create a copy of enchanted creature except the copy has base power and toughness 1/1 and isn't legendary.
Aura swap
.(
: Add {L}.)
({L} can be used to pay
or 1 life.)
: Add {L}.)
({L} can be used to pay
or 1 life.)If this spell would enter the stack, you put it on the bottom of the stack instead.
Split second.
Split second.
Cantrip (when you draw this card, you may reveal it and cast it. If you do, draw a card).
This turn, all cards with mana value 3-X or more have cantrip.
This turn, all cards with mana value 3-X or more have cantrip.
Recent comments: (all recent activity)
See other cardsets
(N.B.: if you keep paying the cost, this has 2 age counters after the first upkeep, 6 after the second, then 14, 30, 62 etc, since each time it goes n -> (n+1)*2)
Uh. That's indeed a problem. I think this trick (quite ugly, admittedly) may work? This way, it enters as a 0/1, the soulbond "when this enters" trigger can be allowed to resolve, then this becomes a -7/-7 when it is already (possibly) paired
I think there's a mechanical problem here. Soulbond's nested rulings begin with "When this creature enters, ..." - notably not "As this creature enters, ...", meaning that this would as is this die to state-based actions before it could ever get that +10/+10 from the soulbond ability.
That's fair; added a clause to make the process essentially ignore lands
Rebound is a may. This is specifically designed to force being cast again, as a drawback
You misspelled "rebound" as "oath".
I feel lands skew the viability of the two options too much and there needs to be a further distinction for land/nonland.
What does concern me a bit is that this with "in addition" would effectively allow for up to nine extra cards (thou likely over multiple turns) with some selection. Maybe it's fine but seems a bit much?
I might actually recert back to two cards per kicker cost. May be too much of a nerf, not sure
The cost and hoops are strong enough that you could easily replace "instead" with "in addition".
Correct wording for a replacement effect is "if you would draw a card" rather than "whenever you would draw a card".
This is an attempt at a monowhite no-question-asked removal