Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien: Recent Activity

Mechanics | Story | Skeleton

Recent updates to Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien: (Generated at 2024-05-01 03:59:00)
Page 1 - Older activity

2018-03-14 14:18:59: Tahazzar edited Aulë, the Maker:
"gains"
2018-03-14 14:15:43: Tahazzar created the card Aulë, the Maker
2018-02-20 09:49:59: Tahazzar moved the card Primeval Night from Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels into Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien
2018-02-02 09:11:31: Tahazzar moved the card Ulmo, Lord of Waters from Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien into Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels
2018-02-01 07:59:50: Tahazzar moved the card Ulmo, Lord of Waters from Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels into Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien
2018-01-27 10:20:44: Tahazzar moved the card Price of Pride from Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels into Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien
2018-01-27 10:20:35: Tahazzar edited Hells of Iron:
UB06 -> UB07
2018-01-26 11:28:53: Tahazzar edited Hells of Iron:
fixed wording
2018-01-14 10:29:18: Tahazzar created and commented on the card Mourn

Card design by nattyicicle (reddit)

https://www.reddit.com/r/custommagic/comments/74wegx/gotham/

Transferring that flavor from the now deactivated Ley of Lamentation.
2018-01-13 16:07:02: Mal commented on Azaghâl's Guard

Interesting how this may not be a card you want to activate rally on prior to combat, especially since Red looks pretty aggressive in this format.
2018-01-13 08:35:37: Tahazzar created the card The Host of Dân
2018-01-13 08:34:21: Tahazzar edited Broadbeam of Belegost:
Rally in italics.
2018-01-13 08:34:12: Tahazzar edited Azaghâl's Guard:
Rally in italics.
2018-01-13 08:33:47: Tahazzar edited Fingolfin the High King:
Rally in italics.
2018-01-13 08:33:17: Tahazzar edited Gondolin Cavaliers:
Rally in italics.
2018-01-13 08:33:07: Tahazzar edited Windlord:
Rally in italics.
2018-01-13 08:27:16: Tahazzar commented on Sprung from Seeds

seems too pushed at first glance, but I'll probably have a playtest with it before increasing the cost to .
2018-01-13 08:26:00: Tahazzar edited Sprung from Seeds:
rare "up to five" -> uncommon "up to three"
2018-01-13 08:24:32: Tahazzar moved the card Sprung from Seeds from Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels into Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien
2017-12-01 15:26:39: Tahazzar moved the card Enter Door of Night from Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels into Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien
2017-11-19 09:45:41: Tahazzar commented on Cast into the Fire

IMO these kind of effects get the better the more you have them since it becomes more and more dangerous to pay the punisher cost.

Anyway, I think the costing here can be quite flexible here indeed, so that I might be able to cost this reasonable to any 1-4 CMC depending on the overall CMCs appearing on other cards at this rarity.

I could even do this theoretically, if it weren't so inelegant:

> Sorcery
> Destroy target artifact, creature, or land unless its controller has ~ deal X plus 3 damage to them.
2017-11-18 18:18:57: Vitenka commented on Cast into the Fire

Well, six damage is a lot. I wonder how often you'll be stuck going "What can I threaten convincingly enough to get them to be burnt by this?"?
2017-11-18 17:08:00: Mal commented on Cast into the Fire

Seems a bit unreliable. It's unlikely to ever hit what you want to hit in a control deck, and I can't really see myself using the land mode too often unless I'm in a dedicated LD deck.

I think the main issue with this is how unflexible the punisher clause makes it. "Destroy target artifact or land" is pretty Demolish-tier, but adding "creature" to it makes it insanely flexible at , but still reasonably costed (if you're looking to flex "destroy target creature" in red, of course). However, the punisher clause completely negates all flexibility granted in running this spell by making it very unlikely that this spell is going to do what it wants to do when you need it. You could say that's skill-testing, but it just makes me not want to run this in favor of a smaller/narrower removal that has 100% chance of doing what it does when I cast it. It might feel a lot better at for 5 damage? But maybe not at common. I can't see myself wanting multiples.
2017-11-17 17:21:36: Tahazzar edited Cast into the Fire:
-> . Aftershock anyone?
2017-11-17 17:19:34: Tahazzar edited Cast into the Fire:
was with "Destroy target artifact or land. ~ deals 4 damage to its controller." Added "the" into the name.
2017-11-17 17:16:54: Tahazzar created a mechanic in Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien
2017-11-17 16:43:16: Tahazzar moved the card Traverse in Hubris from Silmarillion: The War of the Jewels into Silmarillion: The Love of Lúthien
2017-09-22 08:37:21: Tahazzar commented on Gondolin, the Hidden Realm

Ah, that's because that mana producing syntax has seen lots of changes and this set (unlike the first Silma set) is at a concept / design stage. Many of these cards are quite old tbh.
2017-09-22 08:36:34: Tahazzar edited Gondolin, the Hidden Realm:
updated wording
2017-09-21 21:15:50: Mal commented on Gondolin, the Hidden Realm

Why is the wording "~ produces " when other cards just have "Produce "?

Page 1 - Older activity